Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics derived from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 161 patients with pathologically confirmed EC, assigning them to a training (n = 112) and a test cohort (n = 49) at a 7:3 ratio, and collected their full clinical and imaging data. We manually delineated regions of interest on axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted imaging sequences, expanding them by 3, 5, and 7 mm to define peritumoral regions. We then extracted and selected radiomic features from both intratumoral and peritumoral areas. Using six machine learning algorithms, we developed separate radiomics models and assessed their performance via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To complete the evaluation, we compared statistical differences using the DeLong test and generated calibration curves to verify predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics exhibited no significant correlation with MSI status. In single-sequence analysis, the CE model demonstrated the highest performance (training AUC: 0.912; test AUC: 0.856). The multi-parametric model (T2WI + DWI + CE) outperformed single-sequence models, achieving AUCs of 0.934 and 0.914 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. Peritumoral radiomics independently showed robust predictive value; specifically, the model derived from 3 mm peritumoral features (across DWI) yielded a training AUC of 0.898 and a test AUC of 0.790. Notably, the integration of intratumoral and peritumoral features maximized predictive accuracy. The final model, combining optimal intratumoral features (T2WI + DWI + CE) with 3 mm peritumoral DWI features, achieved the best performance with a remarkable AUC of 0.998 in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: Peritumoral radiomics possesses strong independent predictive value and significantly enhances the performance of intratumoral models. The integration of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics offers a precise, non-invasive method for preoperative MSI prediction, serving as a valuable tool to facilitate clinical decision-making. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study establishes a reliable, non-invasive radiomics approach for the preoperative assessment of MSI status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263743
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer

Xiaoyu He, Xi Yin
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer

Xiaoyu He, Xi Yin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics derived from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 161 patients with pathologically confirmed EC, assigning them to a training (n = 112) and a test cohort (n = 49) at a 7:3 ratio, and collected their full clinical and imaging data. We manually delineated regions of interest on axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted imaging sequences, expanding them by 3, 5, and 7 mm to define peritumoral regions. We then extracted and selected radiomic features from both intratumoral and peritumoral areas. Using six machine learning algorithms, we developed separate radiomics models and assessed their performance via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To complete the evaluation, we compared statistical differences using the DeLong test and generated calibration curves to verify predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics exhibited no significant correlation with MSI status. In single-sequence analysis, the CE model demonstrated the highest performance (training AUC: 0.912; test AUC: 0.856). The multi-parametric model (T2WI + DWI + CE) outperformed single-sequence models, achieving AUCs of 0.934 and 0.914 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. Peritumoral radiomics independently showed robust predictive value; specifically, the model derived from 3 mm peritumoral features (across DWI) yielded a training AUC of 0.898 and a test AUC of 0.790. Notably, the integration of intratumoral and peritumoral features maximized predictive accuracy. The final model, combining optimal intratumoral features (T2WI + DWI + CE) with 3 mm peritumoral DWI features, achieved the best performance with a remarkable AUC of 0.998 in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: Peritumoral radiomics possesses strong independent predictive value and significantly enhances the performance of intratumoral models. The integration of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics offers a precise, non-invasive method for preoperative MSI prediction, serving as a valuable tool to facilitate clinical decision-making. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study establishes a reliable, non-invasive radiomics approach for the preoperative assessment of MSI status.

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.