Integrating evidence-based medicine into UK general surgical training: a modified Delphi consensus study

Abstract Background Recent research has highlighted inconsistent teaching and application of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) within General Surgery. Existing international EBM competency frameworks are not tailored to the specific requirements of surgical training, and no specialty-specific curriculum currently exists. This study seeks to establish the stakeholder-agreed competency foundations that could inform future curricular refinements. Methods A modified Delphi study was conducted electronically with surgical educators involved in postgraduate General Surgery training. Participants rated their agreement to 21 adapted statements using a five-point Likert scale and provided commentary. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥ 75% agreement. Quantitative findings were summarised using percentage agreement, medians, and interquartile ranges; qualitative commentary was retained verbatim after round 1 and analysed thematically after round 2 when the study concluded. Results Thirty-six and twenty-one panellists completed rounds 1 and 2 respectively. Consensus was reached on key EBM competencies including question formulation, evidence retrieval, critical appraisal, and application of evidence in clinical decisions; and on preferred teaching approaches. Qualitative feedback emphasised the value of EBM while identifying feasibility, supervisory capacity, and resource constraints. One statement proposing assessment of EBM through existing Workplace-Based Assessments did not reach consensus across the two rounds. Response stability, supported by panel diversity, consistency and the 58.3% retention rate informed the decision not to proceed to a third round. Conclusion The study establishes consensus on core EBM competencies for General Surgery. These findings provide a stakeholder-informed foundation for curriculum development and highlight assessment through workplace-based mechanisms as an area that requires further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10187-w
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating evidence-based medicine into UK general surgical training: a modified Delphi consensus study

Evripidis Tokidis, Saba Balasubramanian, Pirashanthie Vivekananda-Schmidt
BMC Medical Education
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Integrating evidence-based medicine into UK general surgical training: a modified Delphi consensus study

Evripidis Tokidis, Saba Balasubramanian, Pirashanthie Vivekananda-Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent research has highlighted inconsistent teaching and application of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) within General Surgery. Existing international EBM competency frameworks are not tailored to the specific requirements of surgical training, and no specialty-specific curriculum currently exists. This study seeks to establish the stakeholder-agreed competency foundations that could inform future curricular refinements. Methods A modified Delphi study was conducted electronically with surgical educators involved in postgraduate General Surgery training. Participants rated their agreement to 21 adapted statements using a five-point Likert scale and provided commentary. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥ 75% agreement. Quantitative findings were summarised using percentage agreement, medians, and interquartile ranges; qualitative commentary was retained verbatim after round 1 and analysed thematically after round 2 when the study concluded. Results Thirty-six and twenty-one panellists completed rounds 1 and 2 respectively. Consensus was reached on key EBM competencies including question formulation, evidence retrieval, critical appraisal, and application of evidence in clinical decisions; and on preferred teaching approaches. Qualitative feedback emphasised the value of EBM while identifying feasibility, supervisory capacity, and resource constraints. One statement proposing assessment of EBM through existing Workplace-Based Assessments did not reach consensus across the two rounds. Response stability, supported by panel diversity, consistency and the 58.3% retention rate informed the decision not to proceed to a third round. Conclusion The study establishes consensus on core EBM competencies for General Surgery. These findings provide a stakeholder-informed foundation for curriculum development and highlight assessment through workplace-based mechanisms as an area that requires further evaluation.

BMC Medical Education
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, University College London, University of Manchester, Ulster University
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.