Risk Manageability for Sustainable Public–Private Partnerships Development: Evidence From 25 International Projects

ABSTRACT Many Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects fail in early development because risks are often assessed as static constraints rather than conditions that can be actively reduced through stakeholder action. This study introduces risk manageability as the capacity of stakeholders to actively shape and reduce risk exposure between the Project Selection Phase and the Bid and Proposal Phase. Drawing on 25 international PPP projects, we evaluate 27 risk factors across consortium, financial, construction, and country‐level domains. Successful projects are distinguished not by lower initial risk exposure, but by greater risk reduction during development, particularly in consortium, financial, and construction risks. By contrast, country‐level risks remain largely resistant to project‐level shaping. These findings extend project shaping theory by clarifying the boundary between manageable internal risks and structurally constrained external risks. Practically, the framework helps governments and investors prioritize projects with high shaping potential, reduce early‐stage attrition, and support sustainable infrastructure development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71181
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Manageability for Sustainable Public–Private Partnerships Development: Evidence From 25 International Projects

W C Jung, Seung Heon Han, Chan Young Park
Sustainable Development
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Risk Manageability for Sustainable Public–Private Partnerships Development: Evidence From 25 International Projects

W C Jung, Seung Heon Han, Chan Young Park
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects fail in early development because risks are often assessed as static constraints rather than conditions that can be actively reduced through stakeholder action. This study introduces risk manageability as the capacity of stakeholders to actively shape and reduce risk exposure between the Project Selection Phase and the Bid and Proposal Phase. Drawing on 25 international PPP projects, we evaluate 27 risk factors across consortium, financial, construction, and country‐level domains. Successful projects are distinguished not by lower initial risk exposure, but by greater risk reduction during development, particularly in consortium, financial, and construction risks. By contrast, country‐level risks remain largely resistant to project‐level shaping. These findings extend project shaping theory by clarifying the boundary between manageable internal risks and structurally constrained external risks. Practically, the framework helps governments and investors prioritize projects with high shaping potential, reduce early‐stage attrition, and support sustainable infrastructure development.

Sustainable Development
Yonsei University (KR), Korea Electric Power Corporation (South Korea) (KR), Texas A&M University (US)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.