Three Years of a New Multidisciplinary Adult Neurogenetics Clinic in Singapore

Genetic testing in neurology is playing an increasingly important role because of advances in sequencing technologies and the availability of targeted therapeutic options. In Singapore, clinical practice guidelines introduced in 2018 required genetic counseling as a part of clinical genetic testing, and a moratorium implemented in 2021 limited the use of genetic results to determine insurability. In response to these developments, we established a neurogenetics clinic staffed jointly by a neurologist and genetic counselor in September 2020. The objective of this study was to describe the patient population, referral patterns, and factors associated with the decision to undergo genetic testing and evaluate downstream management changes. We conducted a retrospective cohort review of adult patients seen at the Singapore General Hospital neurogenetics clinic between September 2020 and December 2023. Demographic, clinical, and referral data were collected, along with details on testing decisions, type of genetic tests performed, and outcomes. Logistic regression was used to explore demographic or referral factors associated with genetic testing uptake. A total of 164 patients were evaluated; 128 (78%) proceeded with genetic testing. Among the 36 who declined, cost was the predominant reason (72%), followed by insurability concerns (11%), perceived lack of clinical utility (8%), and not wishing to know the diagnosis (8%). Logistic regression showed no significant demographic or referral-related predictors of testing uptake. Of those tested, 38% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic results, 11% had variants of uncertain significance, and 51% had negative results. Clinical management was modified in 90% of those with pathogenic/likely pathogenic results and 79% with uncertain variants. Our findings demonstrate a high uptake of genetic testing in an adult neurogenetics clinic. Financial barriers remain the most significant deterrent. Genetic results had a direct impact on clinical care for most diagnosed patients, highlighting substantial clinical utility. Hence, reducing financial barriers will be essential as genetic testing becomes increasingly central to diagnosis, treatment, and management of neurologic disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology Genetics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000200391
Primary Topic
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Years of a New Multidisciplinary Adult Neurogenetics Clinic in Singapore

Kaavya Narasimhalu, Anushika Raheja, Sylvia Kam, Celeste Y.T. Chen et al.
Neurology Genetics
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
article

Three Years of a New Multidisciplinary Adult Neurogenetics Clinic in Singapore

Kaavya Narasimhalu, Anushika Raheja, Sylvia Kam, Celeste Y.T. Chen, Eng-King Tan, Breana Cham
article en

Abstract

Genetic testing in neurology is playing an increasingly important role because of advances in sequencing technologies and the availability of targeted therapeutic options. In Singapore, clinical practice guidelines introduced in 2018 required genetic counseling as a part of clinical genetic testing, and a moratorium implemented in 2021 limited the use of genetic results to determine insurability. In response to these developments, we established a neurogenetics clinic staffed jointly by a neurologist and genetic counselor in September 2020. The objective of this study was to describe the patient population, referral patterns, and factors associated with the decision to undergo genetic testing and evaluate downstream management changes. We conducted a retrospective cohort review of adult patients seen at the Singapore General Hospital neurogenetics clinic between September 2020 and December 2023. Demographic, clinical, and referral data were collected, along with details on testing decisions, type of genetic tests performed, and outcomes. Logistic regression was used to explore demographic or referral factors associated with genetic testing uptake. A total of 164 patients were evaluated; 128 (78%) proceeded with genetic testing. Among the 36 who declined, cost was the predominant reason (72%), followed by insurability concerns (11%), perceived lack of clinical utility (8%), and not wishing to know the diagnosis (8%). Logistic regression showed no significant demographic or referral-related predictors of testing uptake. Of those tested, 38% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic results, 11% had variants of uncertain significance, and 51% had negative results. Clinical management was modified in 90% of those with pathogenic/likely pathogenic results and 79% with uncertain variants. Our findings demonstrate a high uptake of genetic testing in an adult neurogenetics clinic. Financial barriers remain the most significant deterrent. Genetic results had a direct impact on clinical care for most diagnosed patients, highlighting substantial clinical utility. Hence, reducing financial barriers will be essential as genetic testing becomes increasingly central to diagnosis, treatment, and management of neurologic disorders.

Neurology GeneticsVol. 12(3)
KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG), National Neuroscience Institute (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.