Mapping the interplay between psychological vulnerability and protective factors in mental health: a network analysis study

Stress-related disorders like depression and anxiety highlight the need for prevention, prompting increased research into various risk and protective factors associated with psychological distress. This study aimed to identify key factors and their strongest associations with distress symptoms within a comprehensive network model of self-reported and behaviorally measured variables. We analyzed interactions between cognitive biases, emotion regulation strategies, emotions, beliefs, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in a cross-sectional sample of 489 participants (78% female) from the general Romanian population using network analysis. Findings indicate that negative emotions, stress, and positive reappraisal were the most highly connected variables to the rest of the network (based on expected influence centrality index). Bridge analyses suggest that stress statistically connects between functional and dysfunctional negative emotions and their associations with mental health factors. Additionally, positive emotions, interpretation bias, and rational beliefs are key in this interplay. These results highlight stress and negative emotions as highly connected nodes in the estimated psychological network, which may guide hypothesis generation for future longitudinal and intervention research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2026.2668692
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the interplay between psychological vulnerability and protective factors in mental health: a network analysis study

Álvaro Sánchez‐López, Oana Alexandra David, Vasile Sîrbu, Ivan Blanco
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Mapping the interplay between psychological vulnerability and protective factors in mental health: a network analysis study

Álvaro Sánchez‐López, Oana Alexandra David, Vasile Sîrbu, Ivan Blanco
article en

Abstract

Stress-related disorders like depression and anxiety highlight the need for prevention, prompting increased research into various risk and protective factors associated with psychological distress. This study aimed to identify key factors and their strongest associations with distress symptoms within a comprehensive network model of self-reported and behaviorally measured variables. We analyzed interactions between cognitive biases, emotion regulation strategies, emotions, beliefs, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in a cross-sectional sample of 489 participants (78% female) from the general Romanian population using network analysis. Findings indicate that negative emotions, stress, and positive reappraisal were the most highly connected variables to the rest of the network (based on expected influence centrality index). Bridge analyses suggest that stress statistically connects between functional and dysfunctional negative emotions and their associations with mental health factors. Additionally, positive emotions, interpretation bias, and rational beliefs are key in this interplay. These results highlight stress and negative emotions as highly connected nodes in the estimated psychological network, which may guide hypothesis generation for future longitudinal and intervention research.

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping the interplay between psychological vulnerability and protective factors in mental health: a network analysis study — Álvaro Sánchez‐López, Oana Alexandra David, et al. · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS