Cavity QED beyond the Jaynes–Cummings model

Abstract As atom-cavity systems are becoming more sophisticated, the limitations of the Jaynes–Cummings model are becoming more apparent. In this paper, we therefore take a more dynamical approach to the modelling of atom-cavity systems and do not reduce the electromagnetic field inside the resonator to a single mode. Our approach shows that the decay rate $$\Gamma _{\textrm{cav}}$$ of an emitter inside a subwavelength cavity with metallic mirrors can be much larger than its free space decay rate $$\Gamma _{\textrm{free}}$$ due to constructive interference effects of the emitted light. In general, however, we find that $$\Gamma _{\textrm{cav}} = \Gamma _{\textrm{free}}$$ to a very good approximation which might explain why atom-cavity experiments with planar mirrors have not been able to operate in the so-called strong coupling regime.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Optical and Quantum Electronics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-026-08847-8
Primary Topic
Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cavity QED beyond the Jaynes–Cummings model

Gin Jose, Abeer Al Ghamdi, Almut Beige
Optical and Quantum Electronics
Mechanical and Optical Resonators
article

Cavity QED beyond the Jaynes–Cummings model

Gin Jose, Abeer Al Ghamdi, Almut Beige
article en

Abstract

Abstract As atom-cavity systems are becoming more sophisticated, the limitations of the Jaynes–Cummings model are becoming more apparent. In this paper, we therefore take a more dynamical approach to the modelling of atom-cavity systems and do not reduce the electromagnetic field inside the resonator to a single mode. Our approach shows that the decay rate $$\Gamma _{\textrm{cav}}$$ of an emitter inside a subwavelength cavity with metallic mirrors can be much larger than its free space decay rate $$\Gamma _{\textrm{free}}$$ due to constructive interference effects of the emitted light. In general, however, we find that $$\Gamma _{\textrm{cav}} = \Gamma _{\textrm{free}}$$ to a very good approximation which might explain why atom-cavity experiments with planar mirrors have not been able to operate in the so-called strong coupling regime.

Optical and Quantum ElectronicsVol. 58(7)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mechanical and Optical Resonators
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.