A Shallow Echo: Artificial Intelligence and the Semantic Flattening of the Qur'an

ABSTRACT Scriptural Arabic relies on highly intentional word choices, employing apparent synonyms and near‐synonyms that convey distinct semantic values based on their specific textual placement. Historically, computational translation has struggled to reproduce these precise textual boundaries. Addressing this issue, the present investigation assesses how effectively current artificial intelligence renders these cognitive and near‐synonymous pairs into English. Anchored in an established semantic model of lexical relations, this study operationalizes its evaluation through specific diagnostic parameters: connotative divergence, contextual licensing, collocational restrictions and semantic prosody. A curated sample of verses was assembled to evaluate both Neural Machine Translation (NMT) engines and Large Language Models (LLMs), applying strict prompt constraints and overlap checks to mitigate the retrieval of memorized human translations. The selection focuses on six established pairs of terms: khawf and khashyah (fear/awe), sabil and ṭarīq (metaphorical way/physical path), jasad and jism (lifeless body/living form), ḍiyāʾ and nūr (radiance/light), maṭar and ghayth (punitive rain/merciful rain), alongside khalaqa and jaʿala (creation ex nihilo/appointment). Machine‐generated texts were subsequently compared with recognized scholarly interpretations and authoritative exegetical works (tafsīr). The findings demonstrate that modern algorithms neutralize these lexical variations. Instead of providing context‐sensitive equivalents, the programs default to statistically frequent English terms, thereby producing semantically impoverished texts and compromising semantic accuracy. By detailing the specific types of connotative data that escape computational recognition, this paper clarifies the present limitations of applying automated processing to religious texts. This analysis consequently provides a definitive foundation for evaluating future programming iterations in the field of automated scriptural rendering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learned Publishing
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2063
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Shallow Echo: Artificial Intelligence and the Semantic Flattening of the Qur'an

Ekrema Shehab
Learned Publishing
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

A Shallow Echo: Artificial Intelligence and the Semantic Flattening of the Qur'an

Ekrema Shehab
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scriptural Arabic relies on highly intentional word choices, employing apparent synonyms and near‐synonyms that convey distinct semantic values based on their specific textual placement. Historically, computational translation has struggled to reproduce these precise textual boundaries. Addressing this issue, the present investigation assesses how effectively current artificial intelligence renders these cognitive and near‐synonymous pairs into English. Anchored in an established semantic model of lexical relations, this study operationalizes its evaluation through specific diagnostic parameters: connotative divergence, contextual licensing, collocational restrictions and semantic prosody. A curated sample of verses was assembled to evaluate both Neural Machine Translation (NMT) engines and Large Language Models (LLMs), applying strict prompt constraints and overlap checks to mitigate the retrieval of memorized human translations. The selection focuses on six established pairs of terms: khawf and khashyah (fear/awe), sabil and ṭarīq (metaphorical way/physical path), jasad and jism (lifeless body/living form), ḍiyāʾ and nūr (radiance/light), maṭar and ghayth (punitive rain/merciful rain), alongside khalaqa and jaʿala (creation ex nihilo/appointment). Machine‐generated texts were subsequently compared with recognized scholarly interpretations and authoritative exegetical works (tafsīr). The findings demonstrate that modern algorithms neutralize these lexical variations. Instead of providing context‐sensitive equivalents, the programs default to statistically frequent English terms, thereby producing semantically impoverished texts and compromising semantic accuracy. By detailing the specific types of connotative data that escape computational recognition, this paper clarifies the present limitations of applying automated processing to religious texts. This analysis consequently provides a definitive foundation for evaluating future programming iterations in the field of automated scriptural rendering.

Learned PublishingVol. 39(3)
An-Najah National University (PS)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.