Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target

Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature's contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71860-8
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target

Chris Sandbrook, James Fitzsimons, Alain Fréchette, Priya Shyamsundar et al.
Nature Communications
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target

Chris Sandbrook, James Fitzsimons, Alain Fréchette, Priya Shyamsundar, David Mwesigye Tumusiime, Janeth Lessmann, Carolina Hazin, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Josefa Cariño Tauli, Rachael Devorah Garrett, Rose Pritchard, Marion Pfeifer, Jasmin Upton, Casey M. Ryan, Fred Onyai, Ruth Pinto, Milagre O. F. Nuvunga, Javier Fajardo, Julie G. Zaehringer, Forrest Fleischman, Heather C. Bingham, Tobias Kuemmerle, Gary R. Watmough, Dan Brockington, Brian O’Donnell
article en

Abstract

Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature's contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Bern (CH), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), The Nature Conservancy (US), University of Tasmania (AU), University of Minnesota (US), Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), Deakin University (AU), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), University of the Philippines Baguio (PH), International Institute for Environment and Development (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Kampala University (UG), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Walter S. Johnson Foundation (US), Institute of Geography (KZ), Youth Development (US), Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ES), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB), MICAIA Foundation (MZ), Swiss Academy of Sciences (CH), Wyss Academy for Nature, Makerere University (UG), Newcastle University (GB), Rights and Resources (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Science for Nature and People Partnership, Leverhulme Trust, European Commission, University of Edinburgh, Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.