A Fish Rots from the Head Down: How Founders Lead Startup Fraud

Despite growing scholarly attention on entrepreneurial misconduct, little is known about how founders shape and sustain fraudulent practices through their influence over employees. Using an in-depth case study of Theranos—a fraudulent startup—we develop a grounded process model that explains how startup fraud is not simply the result of regulatory gaps or individual overreach but a multilevel embedded phenomenon. We provide insights into how founders shape employee responses to fraud in startups, eliciting both resistance and complicity. Employees, in turn, engage in a fluctuating moral evaluation process, oscillating between condoning and condemning fraud. We contribute to the literature on startup fraud by distinguishing it from fraud in established organizations, advancing a social process perspective on employee moral processes, and illuminating how founders enact multilevel influence mechanisms that embed fraud in startup contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063261444594
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Fish Rots from the Head Down: How Founders Lead Startup Fraud

Dean A. Shepherd, Manuel Heß, Janine Crivelli, Joakim Wincent
Journal of Management
Ethics in Business and Education
article

A Fish Rots from the Head Down: How Founders Lead Startup Fraud

Dean A. Shepherd, Manuel Heß, Janine Crivelli, Joakim Wincent
article en

Abstract

Despite growing scholarly attention on entrepreneurial misconduct, little is known about how founders shape and sustain fraudulent practices through their influence over employees. Using an in-depth case study of Theranos—a fraudulent startup—we develop a grounded process model that explains how startup fraud is not simply the result of regulatory gaps or individual overreach but a multilevel embedded phenomenon. We provide insights into how founders shape employee responses to fraud in startups, eliciting both resistance and complicity. Employees, in turn, engage in a fluctuating moral evaluation process, oscillating between condoning and condemning fraud. We contribute to the literature on startup fraud by distinguishing it from fraud in established organizations, advancing a social process perspective on employee moral processes, and illuminating how founders enact multilevel influence mechanisms that embed fraud in startup contexts.

Journal of Management
University of Notre Dame (US), University of St.Gallen (CH), Hanken School of Economics (FI), Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.