Case variation in quantifier constructions in the Mordvinic languages

Abstract This paper presents a descriptive study of the case variation of nouns attested in quantifier constructions of Mordvinic. We illustrate the contexts in which the case variation occurs and investigate the reasons behind it. Data is extracted from the MokshEr-corpus, which consists of texts written in the contemporary literary languages. The results show that the marking of the noun varies according to the features of the quantifier and the relationship between the noun and the quantifier. Such variation is observed in three constructions with quantifiers: (1) adnominal modification, (2) partitive constructions, and (3) quantificational clauses. The nominal marking varies between the nominative and separative strategies, which is observed in both languages, although with significant differences in their distribution. We argue that the common starting point for the use of the separative strategy is in partitive constructions, while the differences in the declension paradigm in these languages have led to the diverse uses of the separative cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00045.ber
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case variation in quantifier constructions in the Mordvinic languages

Denys Teptiuk, Mariann Bernhardt
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Linguistics and language evolution
article

Case variation in quantifier constructions in the Mordvinic languages

Denys Teptiuk, Mariann Bernhardt
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a descriptive study of the case variation of nouns attested in quantifier constructions of Mordvinic. We illustrate the contexts in which the case variation occurs and investigate the reasons behind it. Data is extracted from the MokshEr-corpus, which consists of texts written in the contemporary literary languages. The results show that the marking of the noun varies according to the features of the quantifier and the relationship between the noun and the quantifier. Such variation is observed in three constructions with quantifiers: (1) adnominal modification, (2) partitive constructions, and (3) quantificational clauses. The nominal marking varies between the nominative and separative strategies, which is observed in both languages, although with significant differences in their distribution. We argue that the common starting point for the use of the separative strategy is in partitive constructions, while the differences in the declension paradigm in these languages have led to the diverse uses of the separative cases.

Journal of Uralic Linguistics
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Tartu (EE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Case variation in quantifier constructions in the Mordvinic languages — Denys Teptiuk, Mariann Bernhardt · Journal of Uralic Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS