Estimation of glaucomatous impairment in the visual field, excluding the effect of posterior capsule opacification

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) significantly hinders the accurate assessment of glaucomatous visual field (VF) impairment. While pattern deviation (PD) is theoretically intended to correct for generalized sensitivity loss, its accuracy in eyes with PCO remains unverified. This study evaluated 52 eyes of 46 patients with open-angle glaucoma and PCO. Following laser capsulotomy, visual acuity significantly improved from 0.22 to 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (P < 0.01), and mean total deviation (mTD) improved from - 8.89 dB to -6.46 dB (P < 0.01). This post-capsulotomy mTD served as the reference for true impairment. A linear regression model incorporating pre-capsulotomy visual acuity and mTD was developed and validated using leave-one-out cross-validation. The absolute estimation error of this model was significantly smaller (median: 1.66 dB [interquartile range: 1.04-2.77 dB]) compared to that of PD (2.14 dB [1.10-3.99 dB], P < 0.01). Notably, PD-based errors were significantly influenced by both glaucoma severity and the degree of PCO-induced sensitivity loss, resulting in substantial underestimation in advanced cases. These findings indicate that PD is prone to inaccuracy in eyes with PCO, whereas the regression model offers a more precise estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48198-8
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of glaucomatous impairment in the visual field, excluding the effect of posterior capsule opacification

Tsuyoshi Matsuno, Ryo Tomita, Taiga Inooka, Ryo Asaoka et al.
Scientific Reports
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Estimation of glaucomatous impairment in the visual field, excluding the effect of posterior capsule opacification

Tsuyoshi Matsuno, Ryo Tomita, Taiga Inooka, Ryo Asaoka, Kenya Yuki, Koji M. Nishiguchi, Hidekazu Inami
article en

Abstract

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) significantly hinders the accurate assessment of glaucomatous visual field (VF) impairment. While pattern deviation (PD) is theoretically intended to correct for generalized sensitivity loss, its accuracy in eyes with PCO remains unverified. This study evaluated 52 eyes of 46 patients with open-angle glaucoma and PCO. Following laser capsulotomy, visual acuity significantly improved from 0.22 to 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (P < 0.01), and mean total deviation (mTD) improved from - 8.89 dB to -6.46 dB (P < 0.01). This post-capsulotomy mTD served as the reference for true impairment. A linear regression model incorporating pre-capsulotomy visual acuity and mTD was developed and validated using leave-one-out cross-validation. The absolute estimation error of this model was significantly smaller (median: 1.66 dB [interquartile range: 1.04-2.77 dB]) compared to that of PD (2.14 dB [1.10-3.99 dB], P < 0.01). Notably, PD-based errors were significantly influenced by both glaucoma severity and the degree of PCO-induced sensitivity loss, resulting in substantial underestimation in advanced cases. These findings indicate that PD is prone to inaccuracy in eyes with PCO, whereas the regression model offers a more precise estimation.

Scientific Reports
Seirei Christopher University (JP), Nagoya University Hospital (JP), Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital (JP), Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Glaucoma Research Foundation, Soochow University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.