Assessment of geometric variations in fused filament fabrication: impact of material and process setting

Abstract Additive Manufacturing enables the production of complex and customized structures but achieving consistent geometric fidelity and dimensional control remains challenging. Variations in form and feature orientation can compromise functional performance, making it essential to understand how process and material parameters affect geometric deviations and support robust qualification. This research investigates the effects of infill density, scale, and material type on geometric variations in Fused Filament Fabrication parts. Two shapes (prismatic and solid-of-revolution) were designed, with geometric variations grouped by feature orientation (vertical, horizontal, and inclined). The experimental plan considers three infill density levels (25%, 50%, 75%), three scale factors (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1), and four materials (PET-G, PET-G CF, Nylon, Nylon CF), for a total of 120 samples, whose actual geometries were reconstructed via laser scanning, providing the basis for evaluations of data through numerical analysis. The results revealed that input parameters affect geometric accuracy, negatively impacting inclined features with increasing scale, while improving some horizontal features with increasing infill density. Materials, particularly carbon fiber reinforced, help reduce deviations, particularly in vertical geometric features. The study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate input variable settings and material types to achieve the desired accuracy, providing a tolerance catalogue within a specified range for designers and engineers to define tolerances for 3D-printed parts. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-026-01695-8
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of geometric variations in fused filament fabrication: impact of material and process setting

Salvatore Gerbino, Mario Brandon Russo, Ramisha Sajjad, Alessandro Greco
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Assessment of geometric variations in fused filament fabrication: impact of material and process setting

Salvatore Gerbino, Mario Brandon Russo, Ramisha Sajjad, Alessandro Greco
article en

Abstract

Abstract Additive Manufacturing enables the production of complex and customized structures but achieving consistent geometric fidelity and dimensional control remains challenging. Variations in form and feature orientation can compromise functional performance, making it essential to understand how process and material parameters affect geometric deviations and support robust qualification. This research investigates the effects of infill density, scale, and material type on geometric variations in Fused Filament Fabrication parts. Two shapes (prismatic and solid-of-revolution) were designed, with geometric variations grouped by feature orientation (vertical, horizontal, and inclined). The experimental plan considers three infill density levels (25%, 50%, 75%), three scale factors (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1), and four materials (PET-G, PET-G CF, Nylon, Nylon CF), for a total of 120 samples, whose actual geometries were reconstructed via laser scanning, providing the basis for evaluations of data through numerical analysis. The results revealed that input parameters affect geometric accuracy, negatively impacting inclined features with increasing scale, while improving some horizontal features with increasing infill density. Materials, particularly carbon fiber reinforced, help reduce deviations, particularly in vertical geometric features. The study emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate input variable settings and material types to achieve the desired accuracy, providing a tolerance catalogue within a specified range for designers and engineers to define tolerances for 3D-printed parts. Graphical abstract

Progress in Additive Manufacturing
University of Salerno (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.