Implementation Outcomes and Impact of a School Health and Wellness Network Specialist Intervention in Chicago Public Schools

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation, impact, and cost-effectiveness of a Network Specialist intervention focused on health and wellness policy implementation in Chicago Public Schools. Education sector (Multi-Tiered System of Supports) and implementation science (Implementation Outcomes Framework, SISTER) frameworks informed the intervention. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental case-comparison efficacy study conducted between 2020-2021 and 2022-2023. Annual survey data and key informant interviews were used to evaluate implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility); survey and administrative data were used to assess impact and cost effectiveness using difference-in-difference (DID) analyses and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). SETTING: One elementary school Network located on Chicago's Westside (intervention) and 1 socio-demographically matched comparison Network (DID only). PARTICIPANTS: Network Specialists, school-level stakeholders, and school-level administrative data. INTERVENTION: The Network Specialist provided a multi-tiered system of support to schools for health and wellness policy implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Healthy CPS score (out of 100) and ICER. RESULTS: The Specialist served 20 schools/year and an average of 302 students/school. At least 85% of school stakeholders perceived high levels of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of working with the Specialist to support policy implementation. Schools in the intervention Network increased their Healthy CPS scores by 8 percentage points (70.95% pre vs. 78.95% post; P = .03), whereas scores stayed the same in the comparison network (74.03% pre vs. 73.03% post; P = .68), for an estimated 9-percentage point DID-estimated impact (P = .04). The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that it cost each school $414, on average, to increase their Healthy CPS score by 1 percentage-point. CONCLUSIONS: Having a designated district-level Specialist to provide multi-tiered supports to schools to help with health and wellness policy implementation is cost-effective and is valued and appreciated by schools. The Specialist connects schools to key resources and services which enables them to improve their school-level implementation of federal, state and local health and wellness policy requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002350
Primary Topic
School Health and Nursing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Outcomes and Impact of a School Health and Wellness Network Specialist Intervention in Chicago Public Schools

Julien Leider, Jamie Tully, Jeremiah Simon, Yu Chen Lin et al.
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
School Health and Nursing Education
article

Implementation Outcomes and Impact of a School Health and Wellness Network Specialist Intervention in Chicago Public Schools

Julien Leider, Jamie Tully, Jeremiah Simon, Yu Chen Lin, Madison Offstein, Elizabeth Jarpe‐Ratner, Tarrah DeClemente, Sean Zolfo, Jamie F. Chriqui
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation, impact, and cost-effectiveness of a Network Specialist intervention focused on health and wellness policy implementation in Chicago Public Schools. Education sector (Multi-Tiered System of Supports) and implementation science (Implementation Outcomes Framework, SISTER) frameworks informed the intervention. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental case-comparison efficacy study conducted between 2020-2021 and 2022-2023. Annual survey data and key informant interviews were used to evaluate implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility); survey and administrative data were used to assess impact and cost effectiveness using difference-in-difference (DID) analyses and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). SETTING: One elementary school Network located on Chicago's Westside (intervention) and 1 socio-demographically matched comparison Network (DID only). PARTICIPANTS: Network Specialists, school-level stakeholders, and school-level administrative data. INTERVENTION: The Network Specialist provided a multi-tiered system of support to schools for health and wellness policy implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Healthy CPS score (out of 100) and ICER. RESULTS: The Specialist served 20 schools/year and an average of 302 students/school. At least 85% of school stakeholders perceived high levels of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of working with the Specialist to support policy implementation. Schools in the intervention Network increased their Healthy CPS scores by 8 percentage points (70.95% pre vs. 78.95% post; P = .03), whereas scores stayed the same in the comparison network (74.03% pre vs. 73.03% post; P = .68), for an estimated 9-percentage point DID-estimated impact (P = .04). The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that it cost each school $414, on average, to increase their Healthy CPS score by 1 percentage-point. CONCLUSIONS: Having a designated district-level Specialist to provide multi-tiered supports to schools to help with health and wellness policy implementation is cost-effective and is valued and appreciated by schools. The Specialist connects schools to key resources and services which enables them to improve their school-level implementation of federal, state and local health and wellness policy requirements.

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Copiah-Lincoln Community College (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Green Circle (CZ)
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
School Health and Nursing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.