National Security Laws in India

National security legislation often creates a delicate balance between governmental authority and personal freedoms. In India, this tension is particularly evident through a combination of colonial-era and post-independence laws that regulate armed conflicts and insurgencies. This study focuses on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA), exploring its roots in colonial rule, key operational clauses, and the important constitutional and human rights issues it presents. It reviews the development of court rulings—from the relatively lenient approach in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India (1998) to the stronger emphasis on accountability in EEVFAM v. Union of India (2016)—as a dynamic body of legal thought. The analysis suggests that necessary changes are required by constitutional principles and can be implemented effectively while maintaining essential security goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i11-1717795
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Security Laws in India

Yash Bhardwaj
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

National Security Laws in India

Yash Bhardwaj
article en

Abstract

National security legislation often creates a delicate balance between governmental authority and personal freedoms. In India, this tension is particularly evident through a combination of colonial-era and post-independence laws that regulate armed conflicts and insurgencies. This study focuses on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA), exploring its roots in colonial rule, key operational clauses, and the important constitutional and human rights issues it presents. It reviews the development of court rulings—from the relatively lenient approach in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights v. Union of India (1998) to the stronger emphasis on accountability in EEVFAM v. Union of India (2016)—as a dynamic body of legal thought. The analysis suggests that necessary changes are required by constitutional principles and can be implemented effectively while maintaining essential security goals.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(11)
Amity University (AE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.