Learning and using AI: how critical awareness shapes attitudes and engagement

Purpose Despite growing attention to artificial intelligence (AI), studies that examine critical perspectives on AI and its behavioral influences remain limited. This study aims to investigate how positive and negative attitudes toward AI, together with critical awareness, are associated with intentions to learn AI and frequency of AI use. Design/methodology/approach Survey data from 726 college students in South Korea were analyzed to test the direct and moderating effects of attitudes and critical awareness on learning intentions and AI use. Findings Positive attitudes are significantly related to stronger intentions to learn AI and higher frequency of AI use, whereas negative attitudes reduced learning intentions but did not affect actual usage. Critical awareness moderated these relationships, amplifying the positive effects of favorable attitudes on AI use and mitigating the negative effects of unfavorable attitudes on learning intentions. Originality/value This study advances research by distinguishing positive and negative attitudes and positioning critical awareness as a key boundary condition linking attitudes to learning and use behaviors. The findings offer practical implications for workforce development initiatives that prepare learners for AI-driven environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of training and development
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-12-2025-0293
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning and using AI: how critical awareness shapes attitudes and engagement

Hea Jun Yoon, Sehoon Kim
European journal of training and development
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Learning and using AI: how critical awareness shapes attitudes and engagement

Hea Jun Yoon, Sehoon Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose Despite growing attention to artificial intelligence (AI), studies that examine critical perspectives on AI and its behavioral influences remain limited. This study aims to investigate how positive and negative attitudes toward AI, together with critical awareness, are associated with intentions to learn AI and frequency of AI use. Design/methodology/approach Survey data from 726 college students in South Korea were analyzed to test the direct and moderating effects of attitudes and critical awareness on learning intentions and AI use. Findings Positive attitudes are significantly related to stronger intentions to learn AI and higher frequency of AI use, whereas negative attitudes reduced learning intentions but did not affect actual usage. Critical awareness moderated these relationships, amplifying the positive effects of favorable attitudes on AI use and mitigating the negative effects of unfavorable attitudes on learning intentions. Originality/value This study advances research by distinguishing positive and negative attitudes and positioning critical awareness as a key boundary condition linking attitudes to learning and use behaviors. The findings offer practical implications for workforce development initiatives that prepare learners for AI-driven environments.

European journal of training and development
University of Minnesota (US), Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning and using AI: how critical awareness shapes attitudes and engagement — Hea Jun Yoon, Sehoon Kim · European journal of training and development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS