Practice‐Based Evidence for Evidence‐Based Practice: Advancing Financial Planning Through Single‐Case Research

ABSTRACT Financial planning has matured in theory and professional standards yet remains underdeveloped in intervention science—the rigorous testing of what financial planners do and its impact on client behavior . The purpose of this article is to describe and advocate for single‐case research (SCR) methods as a framework for building a cumulative evidence base in financial planning and wealth management. We argue that SCR methods, well established in counseling, education, exercise science, and rehabilitation, offer a practical, ethical, and scientifically credible approach to closing the research‐to‐practice gap. SCR tests cause‐and‐effect relationships within individual clients, can be replicated across cases and settings, and readily integrate with modern advisory data systems. This article summarizes the core research design types, methodological safeguards, and analytic approaches. Additionally, we discuss how SCR can be applied to financial planning contexts and outline a roadmap to close the research‐to‐practice gap by creating practice‐based evidence. An illustrative case demonstrates how practitioners can implement these methods in everyday practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Planning Review
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.70031
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice‐Based Evidence for Evidence‐Based Practice: Advancing Financial Planning Through Single‐Case Research

Michael Kothakota, Jessica Wery
Financial Planning Review
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Practice‐Based Evidence for Evidence‐Based Practice: Advancing Financial Planning Through Single‐Case Research

Michael Kothakota, Jessica Wery
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Financial planning has matured in theory and professional standards yet remains underdeveloped in intervention science—the rigorous testing of what financial planners do and its impact on client behavior . The purpose of this article is to describe and advocate for single‐case research (SCR) methods as a framework for building a cumulative evidence base in financial planning and wealth management. We argue that SCR methods, well established in counseling, education, exercise science, and rehabilitation, offer a practical, ethical, and scientifically credible approach to closing the research‐to‐practice gap. SCR tests cause‐and‐effect relationships within individual clients, can be replicated across cases and settings, and readily integrate with modern advisory data systems. This article summarizes the core research design types, methodological safeguards, and analytic approaches. Additionally, we discuss how SCR can be applied to financial planning contexts and outline a roadmap to close the research‐to‐practice gap by creating practice‐based evidence. An illustrative case demonstrates how practitioners can implement these methods in everyday practice.

Financial Planning ReviewVol. 9(2)
Research Triangle Park Foundation (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practice‐Based Evidence for Evidence‐Based Practice: Advancing Financial Planning Through Single‐Case Research — Michael Kothakota, Jessica Wery · Financial Planning Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS