The Impact of Government-Funded Brief Psychological Interventions on Mental Health: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Italian “Psychological Bonus” Policy

The COVID-19 pandemic amplified an ongoing mental health crisis in Europe. In response, the Italian Ministry of Health introduced the "Psychological Bonus," a government-funded initiative aimed at improving access to brief psychological interventions (BPIs). This longitudinal study examined the effectiveness of these publicly funded BPIs in reducing psychological distress, anxiety, and depression among a large sample of Italian patients, while also exploring the moderating roles of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting. A total of 1,541 participants were assessed at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), and six-month follow-up (T2) using the CORE-10, GAD-7, and PHQ-9. Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using Linear Mixed Models, controlling for age, sex, and session count. Separate models examined the impact of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting (in-person, online, or blended). Significant reductions in psychological distress, depression, and anxiety from baseline to post-treatment were maintained at follow-up, with effect sizes ranging from medium to large across outcomes and timepoints (d = 0.54-0.80). A small but significant attenuation of psychological distress gains was observed between post-treatment and follow-up, while depression and anxiety scores remained stable. Continuation of therapy after the funded sessions did not significantly moderate symptom trajectories. Likewise, no significant differences in change trajectories emerged across therapist theoretical orientations or treatment settings. The findings provide strong support for the effectiveness of the "Psychological Bonus" as a publicly funded BPI, helpful in addressing widespread mental health needs across different therapeutic and delivery models, representing a promising model for mental health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-026-01657-y
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Government-Funded Brief Psychological Interventions on Mental Health: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Italian “Psychological Bonus” Policy

Ilaria Maria Antonietta Benzi, Rossana Smeriglio, Antonino La Tona, Nicola Carone et al.
Community Mental Health Journal
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

The Impact of Government-Funded Brief Psychological Interventions on Mental Health: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Italian “Psychological Bonus” Policy

Ilaria Maria Antonietta Benzi, Rossana Smeriglio, Antonino La Tona, Nicola Carone, Cristina Zarbo, Vittorio Lingiardi, Marianna Liotti, Angelo Compare, E Camussi, David Lazzari, Gianluca Lo Coco, Santo Di Nuovo, Laura Antonia Lucia Parolin
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic amplified an ongoing mental health crisis in Europe. In response, the Italian Ministry of Health introduced the "Psychological Bonus," a government-funded initiative aimed at improving access to brief psychological interventions (BPIs). This longitudinal study examined the effectiveness of these publicly funded BPIs in reducing psychological distress, anxiety, and depression among a large sample of Italian patients, while also exploring the moderating roles of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting. A total of 1,541 participants were assessed at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), and six-month follow-up (T2) using the CORE-10, GAD-7, and PHQ-9. Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using Linear Mixed Models, controlling for age, sex, and session count. Separate models examined the impact of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting (in-person, online, or blended). Significant reductions in psychological distress, depression, and anxiety from baseline to post-treatment were maintained at follow-up, with effect sizes ranging from medium to large across outcomes and timepoints (d = 0.54-0.80). A small but significant attenuation of psychological distress gains was observed between post-treatment and follow-up, while depression and anxiety scores remained stable. Continuation of therapy after the funded sessions did not significantly moderate symptom trajectories. Likewise, no significant differences in change trajectories emerged across therapist theoretical orientations or treatment settings. The findings provide strong support for the effectiveness of the "Psychological Bonus" as a publicly funded BPI, helpful in addressing widespread mental health needs across different therapeutic and delivery models, representing a promising model for mental health policy.

Community Mental Health Journal
University of Bergamo (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Fondazione Roma (IT), University of Catania (IT), Centro Diagnostico Italiano (IT), Istituto Psicoanalitico per le Ricerche Sociali (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.