Exploring the utility of artificial intelligence in identifying progression of prostate cancer during active surveillance: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: There is a recent surge in interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in prostate cancer (PCa). When evaluating PSMA PET scans, AI has shown promise in detecting intraprostatic cancer and metastatic disease. This systematic review aims to assess the ability of AI to detect or predict the progression of PCa during AS. METHODS: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42024529354) and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Only studies evaluating AI in AS-eligible patients were included. RESULTS: After screening 842 articles, 12 studies were suitable for inclusion. The included studies comprised of 4622 AS patients of whom 1022 experienced progressions. Only three studies utilised developed their AI purely on clinicopathological variables. The area under curve (AUC) of these three AI ranged between 0.65 and 0.76, and the AI algorithm in one study outperformed traditional logistic regression. The integration of MRI parameters particularly the use of radiomics improves the ability of AI to predict progression as compared to clinicopathological variables alone. AI was also able to analyse serial MRI during AS and performs on par with the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system. The AUC of the AI algorithms which included MRI parameters ranged between 0.65 and 0.95. One of the limitations was the variability in study methodologies and inclusion criteria. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used and none of the studies had high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: AI shows promise in detecting PCa progression during AS. However, this systematic review highlights the need for larger prospective studies with external validation before AI can be integrated into the AS process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01107-6
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the utility of artificial intelligence in identifying progression of prostate cancer during active surveillance: A systematic review

Thilakavathi Chengodu, M. Palaniswami, N.B. Desai, Thomas P. Cundy et al.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Exploring the utility of artificial intelligence in identifying progression of prostate cancer during active surveillance: A systematic review

Thilakavathi Chengodu, M. Palaniswami, N.B. Desai, Thomas P. Cundy, Jianliang Liu, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Marlon Perera, Dixon T. S. Woon, Wafy Ahmad
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a recent surge in interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in prostate cancer (PCa). When evaluating PSMA PET scans, AI has shown promise in detecting intraprostatic cancer and metastatic disease. This systematic review aims to assess the ability of AI to detect or predict the progression of PCa during AS. METHODS: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42024529354) and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Only studies evaluating AI in AS-eligible patients were included. RESULTS: After screening 842 articles, 12 studies were suitable for inclusion. The included studies comprised of 4622 AS patients of whom 1022 experienced progressions. Only three studies utilised developed their AI purely on clinicopathological variables. The area under curve (AUC) of these three AI ranged between 0.65 and 0.76, and the AI algorithm in one study outperformed traditional logistic regression. The integration of MRI parameters particularly the use of radiomics improves the ability of AI to predict progression as compared to clinicopathological variables alone. AI was also able to analyse serial MRI during AS and performs on par with the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system. The AUC of the AI algorithms which included MRI parameters ranged between 0.65 and 0.95. One of the limitations was the variability in study methodologies and inclusion criteria. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used and none of the studies had high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: AI shows promise in detecting PCa progression during AS. However, this systematic review highlights the need for larger prospective studies with external validation before AI can be integrated into the AS process.

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Prostate Cancer Research (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.