From Aiken to AI: Evolution and Innovation in Combatting Treaty Shopping and Tax Avoidance in International Tax Law

This study examines the persistent challenges of tax treaty shopping and tax avoidance in international tax law. It focuses on the evolution of anti-abuse mechanisms and explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in this context. Using the Aiken Industries case (1971) as a foundation, it analyses the interplay between legal certainty and interpretive flexibility in addressing abuse in tax treaty application. Building on this foundation, the study considers how AI may assist in addressing existing limitations by enhancing the interpretation and application of anti-abuse measures, thereby supporting their further development. At the same time, it examines the challenges associated with the use of AI in tax administration, including transparency, explainability and regulatory compliance. Adopting a functional and comparative approach, the study examines both the potential and limitations of existing anti-abuse mechanisms and the potential and risks of integrating AI into their application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Tax Studies
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/2fvstnv
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Aiken to AI: Evolution and Innovation in Combatting Treaty Shopping and Tax Avoidance in International Tax Law

Amedeo Rizzo, Anniekvan Elzelingen
International Tax Studies
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

From Aiken to AI: Evolution and Innovation in Combatting Treaty Shopping and Tax Avoidance in International Tax Law

Amedeo Rizzo, Anniekvan Elzelingen
article en

Abstract

This study examines the persistent challenges of tax treaty shopping and tax avoidance in international tax law. It focuses on the evolution of anti-abuse mechanisms and explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in this context. Using the Aiken Industries case (1971) as a foundation, it analyses the interplay between legal certainty and interpretive flexibility in addressing abuse in tax treaty application. Building on this foundation, the study considers how AI may assist in addressing existing limitations by enhancing the interpretation and application of anti-abuse measures, thereby supporting their further development. At the same time, it examines the challenges associated with the use of AI in tax administration, including transparency, explainability and regulatory compliance. Adopting a functional and comparative approach, the study examines both the potential and limitations of existing anti-abuse mechanisms and the potential and risks of integrating AI into their application.

International Tax StudiesVol. 9(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.