Nephron Sparing Treatment (NEST) for small renal masses: understanding patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of a cohort-embedded randomised control trial

BACKGROUND: To understand the perspectives and experiences of patients and healthcare professionals regarding the trial design, recruitment and randomisation process to a novel cohort-embedded RCT design for Nephron Sparing Treatment (NEST) for small renal masses. METHODS: Participants were adult patients with a small renal mass (< 4 cm) randomised to receive either percutaneous cryotherapy (CRO) or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (PRN), and clinicians involved in a trial comparing the two treatments. Semi-structured interviews followed a phenomenological approach and were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 37 patients and 10 clinicians. Wanting to 'give back' influenced participants' decisions to take part in the trial. Most patients expressed that they had a positive and informed experience of the trial. Patients who accepted randomisation to cryotherapy (experimental intervention) were influenced by information provided regarding a potentially shorter recovery timeframe, length of hospitalisation, and lower risk of complication. Those who were randomised to receive partial nephrectomy (standard of care intervention) stated that they felt less anxious receiving 'non-experimental' treatment and felt safer in the knowledge that the tumour was removed. Clinicians expressed that the trial presented an opportunity to work collegially in identifying the best treatment for patients presenting with SRMs, though highlighted that limited consultation time was a challenge to recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the potential feasibility of a future multicentre trial comparing percutaneous cryoablation to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of small renal masses. The study's design, process and intervention were accepted by most, though not all, participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18156881.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01833-7
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nephron Sparing Treatment (NEST) for small renal masses: understanding patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of a cohort-embedded randomised control trial

Miles Walkden, Ravi Barod, Graham Munneke, William H. Wildgoose et al.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Nephron Sparing Treatment (NEST) for small renal masses: understanding patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of a cohort-embedded randomised control trial

Miles Walkden, Ravi Barod, Graham Munneke, William H. Wildgoose, Joana B. Neves, Joseph Santiapillai, Maxine G B Tran, Norman Williams, Nicola Rode, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Axel Bex, David Cullen, Faiz Mumtaz, Elena Pizzo, Hannah Warren, Mark Emberton, Prasad Patki, Veronica Ranieri, Michael Aitchison
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To understand the perspectives and experiences of patients and healthcare professionals regarding the trial design, recruitment and randomisation process to a novel cohort-embedded RCT design for Nephron Sparing Treatment (NEST) for small renal masses. METHODS: Participants were adult patients with a small renal mass (< 4 cm) randomised to receive either percutaneous cryotherapy (CRO) or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (PRN), and clinicians involved in a trial comparing the two treatments. Semi-structured interviews followed a phenomenological approach and were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 37 patients and 10 clinicians. Wanting to 'give back' influenced participants' decisions to take part in the trial. Most patients expressed that they had a positive and informed experience of the trial. Patients who accepted randomisation to cryotherapy (experimental intervention) were influenced by information provided regarding a potentially shorter recovery timeframe, length of hospitalisation, and lower risk of complication. Those who were randomised to receive partial nephrectomy (standard of care intervention) stated that they felt less anxious receiving 'non-experimental' treatment and felt safer in the knowledge that the tumour was removed. Clinicians expressed that the trial presented an opportunity to work collegially in identifying the best treatment for patients presenting with SRMs, though highlighted that limited consultation time was a challenge to recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the potential feasibility of a future multicentre trial comparing percutaneous cryoablation to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of small renal masses. The study's design, process and intervention were accepted by most, though not all, participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18156881.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies
University College Hospital (GB), Department of Health and Social Care (GB), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.