Early Osteogenic and Stromal Marker Responses of Osteoblast-like and Bone-Marrow Stromal Cell Lines to a Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Xenogeneic Bone Graft: An Exploratory In Vitro Analysis

Background: To investigate whether coating xenogeneic bone grafts with hyaluronic acid influences early osteogenic and fibrotic marker expression in vitro. Methods: Three xenograft materials were evaluated, including one hyaluronic acid-coated product and two uncoated deproteinized bovine bone mineral products, all commercially available. Human osteoblast-like cells (U2OS) and bone marrow stromal cells (HS5) were cultured with material extracts. Proliferation was assessed using XTT assay at 24 and 48 h. Cell adhesion was evaluated through fluorescence microscopy. Osteogenic markers (RUNX2, COL1A1) and fibrotic markers (COL3A1, TGF-β3) were quantified using quantitative real-time PCR. Statistical analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Benjamini–Krieger–Yekutieli (BKY) two-stage FDR correction for datasets that met the normality assumption, and the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test for non-normally distributed data (HS5 XTT assay). Pairwise comparisons were restricted to each xenograft group versus the untreated control; an adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At 48 h, the HA-coated xenograft (Xeno1) showed the highest mean metabolic activity in U2OS cells (0.538 ± 0.056) compared with the uncoated Xeno2 (0.450 ± 0.120) and Xeno3 (0.439 ± 0.073); however, after FDR correction no statistically significant differences were observed between groups. The coated material was associated with upregulation of early osteogenic markers, 2.61-fold RUNX2 upregulation (p = 0.01) compared to untreated cells. Both coated and uncoated xenografts demonstrated equivalent suppression of fibrotic markers in HS5 cells, reducing COL3A1 by 92.7% (p = 0.001) and TGF-β3 by 92.1% (p = 0.001). Conclusions: These exploratory in vitro findings suggest that HA coating may enhance early osteogenic marker expression. The observed effects on stromal markers warrant further investigation using primary cells, additional fibrotic endpoints (e.g., TGF-β1, ACTA2), and in vivo models before translational conclusions can be drawn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14050290
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Osteogenic and Stromal Marker Responses of Osteoblast-like and Bone-Marrow Stromal Cell Lines to a Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Xenogeneic Bone Graft: An Exploratory In Vitro Analysis

Ofir Ginesin, Ofri Doppelt‐Flikshtain, Eran Gabay, Hadar Zigdon‐Giladi et al.
Dentistry Journal
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Early Osteogenic and Stromal Marker Responses of Osteoblast-like and Bone-Marrow Stromal Cell Lines to a Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Xenogeneic Bone Graft: An Exploratory In Vitro Analysis

Ofir Ginesin, Ofri Doppelt‐Flikshtain, Eran Gabay, Hadar Zigdon‐Giladi, Yaniv Mayer, Hia Abu Sada
article en

Abstract

Background: To investigate whether coating xenogeneic bone grafts with hyaluronic acid influences early osteogenic and fibrotic marker expression in vitro. Methods: Three xenograft materials were evaluated, including one hyaluronic acid-coated product and two uncoated deproteinized bovine bone mineral products, all commercially available. Human osteoblast-like cells (U2OS) and bone marrow stromal cells (HS5) were cultured with material extracts. Proliferation was assessed using XTT assay at 24 and 48 h. Cell adhesion was evaluated through fluorescence microscopy. Osteogenic markers (RUNX2, COL1A1) and fibrotic markers (COL3A1, TGF-β3) were quantified using quantitative real-time PCR. Statistical analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Benjamini–Krieger–Yekutieli (BKY) two-stage FDR correction for datasets that met the normality assumption, and the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test for non-normally distributed data (HS5 XTT assay). Pairwise comparisons were restricted to each xenograft group versus the untreated control; an adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At 48 h, the HA-coated xenograft (Xeno1) showed the highest mean metabolic activity in U2OS cells (0.538 ± 0.056) compared with the uncoated Xeno2 (0.450 ± 0.120) and Xeno3 (0.439 ± 0.073); however, after FDR correction no statistically significant differences were observed between groups. The coated material was associated with upregulation of early osteogenic markers, 2.61-fold RUNX2 upregulation (p = 0.01) compared to untreated cells. Both coated and uncoated xenografts demonstrated equivalent suppression of fibrotic markers in HS5 cells, reducing COL3A1 by 92.7% (p = 0.001) and TGF-β3 by 92.1% (p = 0.001). Conclusions: These exploratory in vitro findings suggest that HA coating may enhance early osteogenic marker expression. The observed effects on stromal markers warrant further investigation using primary cells, additional fibrotic endpoints (e.g., TGF-β1, ACTA2), and in vivo models before translational conclusions can be drawn.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(5)
Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.