Deep residual network fusing CT images and clinical variables to predict lung adenocarcinoma aggressiveness

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) comprises three invasive subtypes (adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS], minimally invasive adenocarcinoma [MIA], invasive adenocarcinoma [IAC]) with distinct prognoses and management strategies. Preoperative discrimination of these subtypes remains challenging for radiologists, and existing deep learning models rarely integrate multi-modal data for reliable prediction. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multi-modal fusion framework based on the standard ResNet50 architecture, integrating CT images, clinical variables, and tumor markers, to improve the preoperative prediction of ground-glass nodule invasiveness. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 431 patients with pathologically confirmed ground-glass nodules. All patients underwent standard chest computed tomography before surgery. A multi-modal deep learning model was constructed based on the ResNet50 network, combined with clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, and F1-score with five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The proposed multi-modal model achieved an overall accuracy of 72.2%, precision of 95.6%, negative predictive value of 96.0%, weighted F1-score of 40.0%, and multiclass Matthews correlation coefficient of 73.1% in the three-class classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC. Per-class analysis showed precision of 84.6%, 35.7%, and 84.4% and recall of 57.9%, 29.4%, and 81.8% for AIS, MIA, and IAC, respectively. The fusion model yielded a macro-average AUC of 0.87, which was higher than the CT-only model (0.79) and both the senior (0.67) and junior radiologists (0.57). The model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to human readers, particularly for the challenging MIA subtype. CONCLUSION: This multi-modal deep learning model combining CT images, clinical variables, and serum tumor markers enables accurate and robust three-class classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC in ground-glass nodules. The proposed model outperforms both human radiologists and the imaging-only model, suggesting its potential as a reliable auxiliary tool to improve preoperative prediction of lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness and assist clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02411-2
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep residual network fusing CT images and clinical variables to predict lung adenocarcinoma aggressiveness

柳学国, Huang Decheng, K W Li, 洪居陆 et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Deep residual network fusing CT images and clinical variables to predict lung adenocarcinoma aggressiveness

柳学国, Huang Decheng, K W Li, 洪居陆, Tang Binghang, Yujian Zou, Jia Peng, Wenqiang Zhong, Xiaobin Liu, Liping Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) comprises three invasive subtypes (adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS], minimally invasive adenocarcinoma [MIA], invasive adenocarcinoma [IAC]) with distinct prognoses and management strategies. Preoperative discrimination of these subtypes remains challenging for radiologists, and existing deep learning models rarely integrate multi-modal data for reliable prediction. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multi-modal fusion framework based on the standard ResNet50 architecture, integrating CT images, clinical variables, and tumor markers, to improve the preoperative prediction of ground-glass nodule invasiveness. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 431 patients with pathologically confirmed ground-glass nodules. All patients underwent standard chest computed tomography before surgery. A multi-modal deep learning model was constructed based on the ResNet50 network, combined with clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, and F1-score with five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The proposed multi-modal model achieved an overall accuracy of 72.2%, precision of 95.6%, negative predictive value of 96.0%, weighted F1-score of 40.0%, and multiclass Matthews correlation coefficient of 73.1% in the three-class classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC. Per-class analysis showed precision of 84.6%, 35.7%, and 84.4% and recall of 57.9%, 29.4%, and 81.8% for AIS, MIA, and IAC, respectively. The fusion model yielded a macro-average AUC of 0.87, which was higher than the CT-only model (0.79) and both the senior (0.67) and junior radiologists (0.57). The model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to human readers, particularly for the challenging MIA subtype. CONCLUSION: This multi-modal deep learning model combining CT images, clinical variables, and serum tumor markers enables accurate and robust three-class classification of AIS, MIA, and IAC in ground-glass nodules. The proposed model outperforms both human radiologists and the imaging-only model, suggesting its potential as a reliable auxiliary tool to improve preoperative prediction of lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness and assist clinical decision-making.

BMC Medical Imaging
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), First People's Hospital of Foshan (CN), Zhongshan People's Hospital (CN), Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Dongguan People’s Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.