Python-First Feasibility for Vietnamese Learners Aged 10-14: A Literature-Substrate Design for a Direct-Text Pathway Without a Scratch Bridge

Vietnamese K-12 informatics curricula place blockbased programming in primary school and text-based programming (Python, from 2022) from grade 10 onward. Gifted cohorts aimed at competitive programming require text fluency earlier than grade 10 and benefit from an uninterrupted trajectory toward text-based algorithmic work. This paper examines the feasibility of direct Python introduction at grades 5–7 (ages 10–14) without a Scratch precursor. We draw on (i) the developmental-psychology case against age-gating programming constructs (Kuhn, Klahr, Siegler), (ii) the Weintrop-Wilensky block-versus-text comparative evidence, (iii) the MeerbaumSalant catalogue of Scratch-induced misconceptions, (iv) the Moors dual-modality and mutual-translation framework, (v) the Hermans and Sorva accounts of Python-specific learnability and notional-machine difficulty, and (vi) Vietnamese curriculum evidence from SGK Tin học 10–11 and the 2018 General Education Curriculum. We argue that Python-first is feasible at ages 10– 14 subject to three measurable entry criteria (reading fluency, mathematical maturity, keyboard comfort) and we specify a Vol 1 Chapter 1–5 pedagogical design that substitutes Vietnamese natural-language pseudocode (phi-code) plus Python as the two modalities for the Moors mutual-translation paradigm, pre-empts variable-as-box and initialisation-and-scope misconceptions, and respects Vietnamese learners' working-memory budget. We identify seven open questions that the design conditions on but does not resolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20131444
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Python-First Feasibility for Vietnamese Learners Aged 10-14: A Literature-Substrate Design for a Direct-Text Pathway Without a Scratch Bridge

That Le
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Teaching and Learning Programming
preprint

Python-First Feasibility for Vietnamese Learners Aged 10-14: A Literature-Substrate Design for a Direct-Text Pathway Without a Scratch Bridge

That Le
preprint en

Abstract

Vietnamese K-12 informatics curricula place blockbased programming in primary school and text-based programming (Python, from 2022) from grade 10 onward. Gifted cohorts aimed at competitive programming require text fluency earlier than grade 10 and benefit from an uninterrupted trajectory toward text-based algorithmic work. This paper examines the feasibility of direct Python introduction at grades 5–7 (ages 10–14) without a Scratch precursor. We draw on (i) the developmental-psychology case against age-gating programming constructs (Kuhn, Klahr, Siegler), (ii) the Weintrop-Wilensky block-versus-text comparative evidence, (iii) the MeerbaumSalant catalogue of Scratch-induced misconceptions, (iv) the Moors dual-modality and mutual-translation framework, (v) the Hermans and Sorva accounts of Python-specific learnability and notional-machine difficulty, and (vi) Vietnamese curriculum evidence from SGK Tin học 10–11 and the 2018 General Education Curriculum. We argue that Python-first is feasible at ages 10– 14 subject to three measurable entry criteria (reading fluency, mathematical maturity, keyboard comfort) and we specify a Vol 1 Chapter 1–5 pedagogical design that substitutes Vietnamese natural-language pseudocode (phi-code) plus Python as the two modalities for the Moors mutual-translation paradigm, pre-empts variable-as-box and initialisation-and-scope misconceptions, and respects Vietnamese learners' working-memory budget. We identify seven open questions that the design conditions on but does not resolve.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
ElSohly Laboratories (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.