Comparison of cost efficiency between commercially manufactured and in-house aligners: a threshold analysis

To compare the cost efficiency of commercially manufactured and in-house aligner (IHA) workflows. A 30-item electronic survey was distributed to practicing US orthodontists to assess aligner usage and fabrication workflows. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey, and 201 responses met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. For economic modeling, the variable production cost of IHA was estimated at approximately $40–$50 per aligner pair based on commonly reported manufacturing estimates and internal laboratory experience. Survey responses were used to estimate typical aligner quantities and laboratory costs. Capital equipment expenses required for establishing an IHA laboratory were incorporated into the economic model to identify cost-efficiency thresholds. Respondents reported that typical IHA cases involved approximately 5–15 aligner pairs, with laboratory build-out costs most commonly ranging from $2,500 to $10,000. When capital equipment and laboratory costs were incorporated into the model, IHA costs increased linearly with aligner quantity, whereas commercial aligner fees remained relatively fixed per case. Assuming a commercial aligner fee of $1,500 per case, commercially manufactured aligners became more cost-efficient once cases exceeded approximately 22–26 IHA pairs, corresponding to roughly 6 months of treatment. Cost efficiency between IHA and commercially manufactured aligners is primarily driven by anticipated aligner quantity and practice-specific economics rather than fabrication method alone. Identification of clinically relevant threshold points may assist orthodontists in selecting the most appropriate aligner production workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital and Aligner Orthodontics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44525-026-00004-6
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of cost efficiency between commercially manufactured and in-house aligners: a threshold analysis

Neal D Kravitz, T. Scott Jenkins, Nikhilesh R. Vaid, Bob Kumra
Digital and Aligner Orthodontics
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Comparison of cost efficiency between commercially manufactured and in-house aligners: a threshold analysis

Neal D Kravitz, T. Scott Jenkins, Nikhilesh R. Vaid, Bob Kumra
article en

Abstract

To compare the cost efficiency of commercially manufactured and in-house aligner (IHA) workflows. A 30-item electronic survey was distributed to practicing US orthodontists to assess aligner usage and fabrication workflows. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey, and 201 responses met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. For economic modeling, the variable production cost of IHA was estimated at approximately $40–$50 per aligner pair based on commonly reported manufacturing estimates and internal laboratory experience. Survey responses were used to estimate typical aligner quantities and laboratory costs. Capital equipment expenses required for establishing an IHA laboratory were incorporated into the economic model to identify cost-efficiency thresholds. Respondents reported that typical IHA cases involved approximately 5–15 aligner pairs, with laboratory build-out costs most commonly ranging from $2,500 to $10,000. When capital equipment and laboratory costs were incorporated into the model, IHA costs increased linearly with aligner quantity, whereas commercial aligner fees remained relatively fixed per case. Assuming a commercial aligner fee of $1,500 per case, commercially manufactured aligners became more cost-efficient once cases exceeded approximately 22–26 IHA pairs, corresponding to roughly 6 months of treatment. Cost efficiency between IHA and commercially manufactured aligners is primarily driven by anticipated aligner quantity and practice-specific economics rather than fabrication method alone. Identification of clinically relevant threshold points may assist orthodontists in selecting the most appropriate aligner production workflow.

Digital and Aligner OrthodonticsVol. 1(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Edgewood University (US), Harvard University (US), Howard University (US), Stafford College (GB), American Association of Orthodontists (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.