Gender Gaps in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Are Patient Outcomes Shaped by Workforce Inequity?

Background: Gender disparities persist across cardiac and thoracic surgical care, influencing access, procedural selection, perioperative risk, and long-term outcomes. Despite major advances in operative technique and perioperative pathways, women continue to experience delayed diagnosis, lower procedural referral rates, and distinct complication profiles after high-risk procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). These patient-level disparities parallel persistent inequities within the cardiothoracic surgery workforce, raising the possibility that structural workforce imbalances may influence clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to synthesize contemporary evidence (2020-2025) characterizing sex- and gender-based disparities across cardiac and thoracic surgery, identify interconnected root causes, and outline strategies and research priorities for reducing inequities. Methods: A narrative review (2020-2025) combined structured database searches of trials and registries with synthesis of mechanistic and health-system literature to interpret heterogeneous evidence. Results: Women undergoing cardiothoracic procedures often present at older age with greater frailty, smaller anatomical dimensions, and more atypical symptoms, increasing procedural complexity and perioperative risk. CABG and SAVR show higher early morbidity in women, while PCI disparities have narrowed but persist due to delayed recognition; TAVR demonstrates higher early complications yet better mid- and long-term survival. In thoracic surgery, women generally have lower perioperative mortality, but experience delayed diagnosis, lower screening rates, and reduced use of minimally invasive approaches. These outcome differences occur alongside persistent workforce inequities, including the underrepresentation of women in surgical practice, leadership, and academia. Conclusion: Gender disparities in cardiac and thoracic surgery are multifactorial and closely intertwined with systemic workforce inequities. Solutions require sex-aware risk assessment, equitable referral pathways, inclusive device development, mandated sex-stratified reporting, and targeted workforce reforms. Addressing both patient-level and structural contributors is essential to achieve durable gender equity in cardiothoracic surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2867-5247
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Gaps in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Are Patient Outcomes Shaped by Workforce Inequity?

Khaled Ebrahim Al-Ebrahim
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Gender Gaps in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Are Patient Outcomes Shaped by Workforce Inequity?

Khaled Ebrahim Al-Ebrahim
article en

Abstract

Background: Gender disparities persist across cardiac and thoracic surgical care, influencing access, procedural selection, perioperative risk, and long-term outcomes. Despite major advances in operative technique and perioperative pathways, women continue to experience delayed diagnosis, lower procedural referral rates, and distinct complication profiles after high-risk procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). These patient-level disparities parallel persistent inequities within the cardiothoracic surgery workforce, raising the possibility that structural workforce imbalances may influence clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to synthesize contemporary evidence (2020-2025) characterizing sex- and gender-based disparities across cardiac and thoracic surgery, identify interconnected root causes, and outline strategies and research priorities for reducing inequities. Methods: A narrative review (2020-2025) combined structured database searches of trials and registries with synthesis of mechanistic and health-system literature to interpret heterogeneous evidence. Results: Women undergoing cardiothoracic procedures often present at older age with greater frailty, smaller anatomical dimensions, and more atypical symptoms, increasing procedural complexity and perioperative risk. CABG and SAVR show higher early morbidity in women, while PCI disparities have narrowed but persist due to delayed recognition; TAVR demonstrates higher early complications yet better mid- and long-term survival. In thoracic surgery, women generally have lower perioperative mortality, but experience delayed diagnosis, lower screening rates, and reduced use of minimally invasive approaches. These outcome differences occur alongside persistent workforce inequities, including the underrepresentation of women in surgical practice, leadership, and academia. Conclusion: Gender disparities in cardiac and thoracic surgery are multifactorial and closely intertwined with systemic workforce inequities. Solutions require sex-aware risk assessment, equitable referral pathways, inclusive device development, mandated sex-stratified reporting, and targeted workforce reforms. Addressing both patient-level and structural contributors is essential to achieve durable gender equity in cardiothoracic surgical care.

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.