Geographic Variation in Loneliness and Social Isolation in Australia: Socio-Demographic and Healthcare Utilisation Determinants

Background: Loneliness and social isolation are major public health challenges linked to premature mortality and significant healthcare and productivity costs. However, their geographic distribution and socio-demographic determinants remain poorly understood, with few studies applying spatial methods to identify high-need areas and protective factors. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the geographic distribution and determinants of loneliness and social isolation across Australia using a spatial epidemiological approach. Utilising longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, along with Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) census data, greenness vegetation index and walkability index, we employed Bayesian conditional autoregressive (CAR) models to assess spatial and temporal patterns at the Statistical Area Level 3 (SA3) over a 22-year period and present the relative risks (RR) and credible intervals (CrI). Results: Our analysis revealed spatial variation in the RR of both loneliness and social isolation, with notable hotspots in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. In multivariable models, area-level socio-economic disadvantage (as measured by the Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage, IRSAD) (RR = 0.8, 95% CrI: 0.76–0.85) for the highest quintile (most advantaged) and a higher prevalence of depression and/or anxiety (RR = 4.3, 95% CrI: 3.0–6.1) were associated independently with relative risk of loneliness but not with age structure, remoteness, green space or walkability index. For social isolation, higher average hospital admission rates per region were the strongest factor. Conclusions: The spatial heterogeneity observed in our study underscores the need for place-based public health responses, including community-based interventions and targeted resource allocation, especially in disadvantaged communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14101318
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic Variation in Loneliness and Social Isolation in Australia: Socio-Demographic and Healthcare Utilisation Determinants

Laura Hayes, Arul Earnest, Sophia Zoungas, Helen Skouteris et al.
Healthcare
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Geographic Variation in Loneliness and Social Isolation in Australia: Socio-Demographic and Healthcare Utilisation Determinants

Laura Hayes, Arul Earnest, Sophia Zoungas, Helen Skouteris, Michael Berk, Fikru Rizal, Kate Filia, Hossein Nejati, Lidia Engel, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Michelle H. Lim, Ahmadreza Pourghaderi, Sharon Clifford
article en

Abstract

Background: Loneliness and social isolation are major public health challenges linked to premature mortality and significant healthcare and productivity costs. However, their geographic distribution and socio-demographic determinants remain poorly understood, with few studies applying spatial methods to identify high-need areas and protective factors. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the geographic distribution and determinants of loneliness and social isolation across Australia using a spatial epidemiological approach. Utilising longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, along with Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) census data, greenness vegetation index and walkability index, we employed Bayesian conditional autoregressive (CAR) models to assess spatial and temporal patterns at the Statistical Area Level 3 (SA3) over a 22-year period and present the relative risks (RR) and credible intervals (CrI). Results: Our analysis revealed spatial variation in the RR of both loneliness and social isolation, with notable hotspots in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. In multivariable models, area-level socio-economic disadvantage (as measured by the Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage, IRSAD) (RR = 0.8, 95% CrI: 0.76–0.85) for the highest quintile (most advantaged) and a higher prevalence of depression and/or anxiety (RR = 4.3, 95% CrI: 3.0–6.1) were associated independently with relative risk of loneliness but not with age structure, remoteness, green space or walkability index. For social isolation, higher average hospital admission rates per region were the strongest factor. Conclusions: The spatial heterogeneity observed in our study underscores the need for place-based public health responses, including community-based interventions and targeted resource allocation, especially in disadvantaged communities.

HealthcareVol. 14(10)
The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), Orygen Youth Health (AU), Mind Australia (AU), Monash University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.