Thriving in School‐Age Youth: A Latent Profile Analysis of Social‐Emotional Adjustment, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Competence

ABSTRACT The Positive Youth Development (PYD) framework highlights that all youth have the potential to thrive, though the expression and development of their strengths can differ significantly. Recognizing these individual differences is critical for designing effective interventions that help youth apply their strengths to meet developmental demands. This study investigated the variability in three PYD‐related strengths: social‐emotional adjustment, prosocial behavior, and academic competence. The sample consisted of 1719 school‐age youth from Grades 1 to 12 (ages 6–17), drawn from Wave 1 of the second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well‐Being (NSCAW‐II). Latent Profile Analysis was conducted using seven key indicators. Four distinct profiles were identified: Social‐Emotional‐Behavioral Vulnerable (20%), Academically Struggling (16%), Academically Competent with Emotional‐Behavioral Challenged (36%), and Well‐Functioning (28%). These profiles reflect diverse patterns of strengths and challenges across PYD domains, highlighting the need for tailored support strategies—particularly those aimed at strengthening social and emotional competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70176
Primary Topic
Youth Development and Social Support
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thriving in School‐Age Youth: A Latent Profile Analysis of Social‐Emotional Adjustment, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Competence

Jie Luo, Gen Li
Psychology in the Schools
Youth Development and Social Support
article

Thriving in School‐Age Youth: A Latent Profile Analysis of Social‐Emotional Adjustment, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Competence

Jie Luo, Gen Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Positive Youth Development (PYD) framework highlights that all youth have the potential to thrive, though the expression and development of their strengths can differ significantly. Recognizing these individual differences is critical for designing effective interventions that help youth apply their strengths to meet developmental demands. This study investigated the variability in three PYD‐related strengths: social‐emotional adjustment, prosocial behavior, and academic competence. The sample consisted of 1719 school‐age youth from Grades 1 to 12 (ages 6–17), drawn from Wave 1 of the second National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well‐Being (NSCAW‐II). Latent Profile Analysis was conducted using seven key indicators. Four distinct profiles were identified: Social‐Emotional‐Behavioral Vulnerable (20%), Academically Struggling (16%), Academically Competent with Emotional‐Behavioral Challenged (36%), and Well‐Functioning (28%). These profiles reflect diverse patterns of strengths and challenges across PYD domains, highlighting the need for tailored support strategies—particularly those aimed at strengthening social and emotional competencies.

Psychology in the Schools
University of Connecticut (US), University of South Florida (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Youth Development and Social Support
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.