Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the United States: Early Results From the AGENT Postapproval Study

BACKGROUND: AGENT is the only coronary drug-coated balloon (DCB) approved for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to date. In this study, we describe trends in DCB use and compare characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between patients who received DCB versus alternative treatments. METHODS: We included patients in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Disease Registry CathPCI Registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 2024 and June 2025 and received DCB, drug-eluting stent (DES), or plain old balloon angioplasty. Treatment groups were compared using standard mean differences. RESULTS: Between April 2024 and June 2025, 14 946 DCBs were used in 12 337 patients across 704 CathPCI Registry sites. The monthly rate of DCB use for ISR percutaneous coronary intervention grew from <1% to 17.5% during the study period. Of 96 452 ISR procedures performed overall, 9269 (9.61%) involved the use of DCB. DCB procedures were more likely to involve the use of specialty balloons (DCB 45.3% versus DES 17.5% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 28.3%), intravascular imaging (DCB 54.5% versus DES 35.1% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 30.9%), and atherectomy (DCB 14.9% versus DES 6.0% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 7.3%). Among patients treated with DCB, 0.4% experienced myocardial infarction, 0.7% developed cardiogenic shock, 0.2% had an ischemic stroke, and 0.9% died. DCB was separately used in 3459 of 810 483 (0.43%) non-ISR percutaneous coronary interventions. Unadjusted rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes after ISR and non-ISR DCB use were like those for DES (standard mean difference <10%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world DCB use is increasing rapidly in the United States, driven by use in ISR lesions but also with growth among non-ISR lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016625
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the United States: Early Results From the AGENT Postapproval Study

Christina Lalani, Saroj Neupane, Kathleen E. Kearney, Eric Secemsky et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the United States: Early Results From the AGENT Postapproval Study

Christina Lalani, Saroj Neupane, Kathleen E. Kearney, Eric Secemsky, Rafael Cavalcante, Rhian Davies, Jarrod D. Frizzell, Matthew J. Price, Robert W. Yeh, Huaying Dong, Ziad A. Ali, Ajay J. Kirtane, Jordan Safirstein, Yang Song, Amar Krishnaswamy
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AGENT is the only coronary drug-coated balloon (DCB) approved for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to date. In this study, we describe trends in DCB use and compare characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between patients who received DCB versus alternative treatments. METHODS: We included patients in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Disease Registry CathPCI Registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 2024 and June 2025 and received DCB, drug-eluting stent (DES), or plain old balloon angioplasty. Treatment groups were compared using standard mean differences. RESULTS: Between April 2024 and June 2025, 14 946 DCBs were used in 12 337 patients across 704 CathPCI Registry sites. The monthly rate of DCB use for ISR percutaneous coronary intervention grew from <1% to 17.5% during the study period. Of 96 452 ISR procedures performed overall, 9269 (9.61%) involved the use of DCB. DCB procedures were more likely to involve the use of specialty balloons (DCB 45.3% versus DES 17.5% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 28.3%), intravascular imaging (DCB 54.5% versus DES 35.1% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 30.9%), and atherectomy (DCB 14.9% versus DES 6.0% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 7.3%). Among patients treated with DCB, 0.4% experienced myocardial infarction, 0.7% developed cardiogenic shock, 0.2% had an ischemic stroke, and 0.9% died. DCB was separately used in 3459 of 810 483 (0.43%) non-ISR percutaneous coronary interventions. Unadjusted rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes after ISR and non-ISR DCB use were like those for DES (standard mean difference <10%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world DCB use is increasing rapidly in the United States, driven by use in ISR lesions but also with growth among non-ISR lesions.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), University of Washington Medical Center (US), Banner Health (US), Morristown Medical Center (US), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), St. Francis Hospital (US), Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US), Christ Hospital (US), Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US), Scripps Clinic (US), WellSpan York Hospital (US), St. Francis Hospital (US), Christ Hospital (US), Deaconess Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.