Science Process Skills in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Conceptual Frameworks, Assessment Approaches, and Instructional Strategies (2010--2026)

This systematic review synthesizes 52 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2026 to examine the conceptualization, assessment, and instruction of science process skills (SPS) in science education. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review identifies persistent conceptual fragmentation in defining basic versus integrated SPS, documents a methodological shift from traditional multiple-choice tests toward Rasch-validated performance rubrics, and finds guided inquiry and POGIL as the most empirically supported instructional strategies. Quality appraisal reveals that while most studies pose clear research questions, few report adequate statistical power or effect sizes with confidence intervals. The review offers evidence-based recommendations for curriculum design, teacher education, and future research, emphasizing the need for longitudinal designs, cross-cultural instrument validation, and replication studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20139123
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science Process Skills in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Conceptual Frameworks, Assessment Approaches, and Instructional Strategies (2010--2026)

Irfan Ananda Ismail, Refitaniza Refitaniza
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Science Process Skills in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Conceptual Frameworks, Assessment Approaches, and Instructional Strategies (2010--2026)

Irfan Ananda Ismail, Refitaniza Refitaniza
article en

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes 52 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2026 to examine the conceptualization, assessment, and instruction of science process skills (SPS) in science education. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review identifies persistent conceptual fragmentation in defining basic versus integrated SPS, documents a methodological shift from traditional multiple-choice tests toward Rasch-validated performance rubrics, and finds guided inquiry and POGIL as the most empirically supported instructional strategies. Quality appraisal reveals that while most studies pose clear research questions, few report adequate statistical power or effect sizes with confidence intervals. The review offers evidence-based recommendations for curriculum design, teacher education, and future research, emphasizing the need for longitudinal designs, cross-cultural instrument validation, and replication studies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
State University of Padang (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Science Process Skills in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Conceptual Frameworks, Assessment Approaches, and Instructional Strategies (2010--2026) — Irfan Ananda Ismail, Refitaniza Refitaniza · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS