Validation of the Revised Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Calculator at an Academic Community Hospital

Objective The 2007 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator included race and ethnicity among the score criteria. These variables were removed in 2021 to decrease the risk of systemic biases impacting counseling regarding birth after cesarean delivery (CD). This study compares test performance of each version of the calculator within our population. Study design Retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients ≥18 years old eligible for TOLAC after one CD between September 2019 and August 2022. Predicted VBAC success scores were calculated for each patient using both the 2007 and 2021 calculators. Predicted scores were separated into categories and patients were stratified by self-identified race/ethnicity for comparison. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to compare sensitivity and specificity of each calculator using predicted scores as continuous variables and as categories (>50%, >60%, and >70%) with actual VBAC outcomes. Calibration metrics were also calculated for each calculator. Results 457 patients met inclusion criteria. Race/ethnicity distribution was 55.0% White, 8.1% Black, 33.7% Hispanic. VBAC success rate was 76.4%. A higher proportion of Black patients had lower predicted scores with the 2007 calculator vs. the 2021 calculator. ROC curves showed similar areas under the curve for both calculators (AUC 0.74 2007 vs. AUC 0.75 2021; p=.22), consistent with similar predictive values between both calculators. The revised calculator had better agreement between observed and predicted VBAC rates within deciles of predicted probabilities. Conclusions In our population, predicted VBAC success rates were lower among Black patients with the 2007 calculator. Both calculators performed similarly in predicting VBAC success with the new calculator having better agreement within deciles of predicted probability. Our data contribute to supporting the VBAC calculator revision, which removed race and ethnicity as criteria in obstetric management of pregnant patients with one CD desiring to attempt TOLAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2874-8487
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Revised Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Calculator at an Academic Community Hospital

Morgan McFadden, Meredith Rochon, Bs Emily Haas, Travis Dayon et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Validation of the Revised Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Calculator at an Academic Community Hospital

Morgan McFadden, Meredith Rochon, Bs Emily Haas, Travis Dayon, Salam Syed, Joanne N. Quiñones-Rivera
article en

Abstract

Objective The 2007 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator included race and ethnicity among the score criteria. These variables were removed in 2021 to decrease the risk of systemic biases impacting counseling regarding birth after cesarean delivery (CD). This study compares test performance of each version of the calculator within our population. Study design Retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients ≥18 years old eligible for TOLAC after one CD between September 2019 and August 2022. Predicted VBAC success scores were calculated for each patient using both the 2007 and 2021 calculators. Predicted scores were separated into categories and patients were stratified by self-identified race/ethnicity for comparison. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to compare sensitivity and specificity of each calculator using predicted scores as continuous variables and as categories (>50%, >60%, and >70%) with actual VBAC outcomes. Calibration metrics were also calculated for each calculator. Results 457 patients met inclusion criteria. Race/ethnicity distribution was 55.0% White, 8.1% Black, 33.7% Hispanic. VBAC success rate was 76.4%. A higher proportion of Black patients had lower predicted scores with the 2007 calculator vs. the 2021 calculator. ROC curves showed similar areas under the curve for both calculators (AUC 0.74 2007 vs. AUC 0.75 2021; p=.22), consistent with similar predictive values between both calculators. The revised calculator had better agreement between observed and predicted VBAC rates within deciles of predicted probabilities. Conclusions In our population, predicted VBAC success rates were lower among Black patients with the 2007 calculator. Both calculators performed similarly in predicting VBAC success with the new calculator having better agreement within deciles of predicted probability. Our data contribute to supporting the VBAC calculator revision, which removed race and ethnicity as criteria in obstetric management of pregnant patients with one CD desiring to attempt TOLAC.

American Journal of Perinatology
Thomas Jefferson University (US), University of South Florida (US), Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.