Computational complexity improves recognition memory for reward-relevant attributes

Computational complexity in optimisation tasks is often seen as impairing optimal choice. We test whether it could have beneficial effects on memory. In a preregistered lab experiment ( N = 131) using the NP-hard 0–1 knapsack problem, we manipulated knapsack capacity to create instances differing in two objective complexity metrics: phase transition proximity and Sahni-k. As predicted, solving a more complex instance resulted in a 44% (d = 0.45) increase in above-chance recognition memory relative to a lower-complexity instance. Participants spent longer on the complex instance and clicked on items more often. A plausible interpretation of these findings is that the increased processing requirements of search algorithms under complexity may have resulted in enhanced encoding through frequent revisiting of reward-relevant information. These findings provide a formal framework to generate hypotheses about the memory consequences of complexity and the effects of cognitive offloading in real-world decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106772
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational complexity improves recognition memory for reward-relevant attributes

Lee de‐Wit, Peter L. Bossaerts, Andreas Kapounek
Cognition
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Computational complexity improves recognition memory for reward-relevant attributes

Lee de‐Wit, Peter L. Bossaerts, Andreas Kapounek
article en

Abstract

Computational complexity in optimisation tasks is often seen as impairing optimal choice. We test whether it could have beneficial effects on memory. In a preregistered lab experiment ( N = 131) using the NP-hard 0–1 knapsack problem, we manipulated knapsack capacity to create instances differing in two objective complexity metrics: phase transition proximity and Sahni-k. As predicted, solving a more complex instance resulted in a 44% (d = 0.45) increase in above-chance recognition memory relative to a lower-complexity instance. Participants spent longer on the complex instance and clicked on items more often. A plausible interpretation of these findings is that the increased processing requirements of search algorithms under complexity may have resulted in enhanced encoding through frequent revisiting of reward-relevant information. These findings provide a formal framework to generate hypotheses about the memory consequences of complexity and the effects of cognitive offloading in real-world decisions.

CognitionVol. 279
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon