Analgesic Efficacy of Unilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block (Lateral Approach) compared with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Abdominal Surgery (Prospective Randomized Comparative Double-blinded Clinical Trial)

Introduction Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks such as quadratus lumborum (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are increasingly used for opioid-sparing analgesia. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic outcome of ultrasound-guided unilateral QLB (lateral approach) and ESPB for use in adult patients undergoing unilateral lower abdominal surgery. Methods In this randomized comparative clinical trial, 48 adult patients scheduled for unilateral lower abdominal surgery were randomized to receive QLB (n = 24) and ESPB (n = 24) following induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours. Results There was no statistical difference for total morphine consumption between the QLB and ESPB groups (5.26 ± 2.17 mg vs. 5.88 ± 2.51 mg; p = 0.376). The median time to first rescue analgesia was greater in the QLB (2 hours [0–18]) vs. the ESPB group (1 hour [0–21]; p = 0.251). Pain scores were not different between groups at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-op (median Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24h: 3 [3–5] QLB, 3 [2–3] ESPB; p = 0.08). There were no differences between groups with respect to hemodynamic parameters, adverse events (nausea and vomiting: 4 in the QLB group, 6 in the ESPB group; p > 0.05) or block performance times (median time: 10min for both). Discussion We consider the clinical role of QLB and ESPB as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in unilateral lower abdominal surgeries. They have a similar safety profile considering the technique and the opioid sparing effects, similar performance characteristics and complication rates, which together suggest both blocks are safe and well-tolerated anesthetic procedures that can be daily practices. Conclusion Both QLB and ESPB provide significant, safe, and comparable postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing unilateral lower abdomen surgery. QLB may provide a slight time benefit to analgesia onset. Trial Registration This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05524038; principal investigator: Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar), registration date: 1/9/ 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Anesthesiology Journal
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0125896458440820260430043619
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analgesic Efficacy of Unilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block (Lateral Approach) compared with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Abdominal Surgery (Prospective Randomized Comparative Double-blinded Clinical Trial)

Joseph Makram Botros, Maged Labib Boules, Mohammed Magdy Basiony, Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar et al.
The Open Anesthesiology Journal
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Analgesic Efficacy of Unilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block (Lateral Approach) compared with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Abdominal Surgery (Prospective Randomized Comparative Double-blinded Clinical Trial)

Joseph Makram Botros, Maged Labib Boules, Mohammed Magdy Basiony, Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar, Mohamed Ahmed Hamed, Fatmaelzahraa Omar Bahr, Mohamed Metwally Elbarbary
article en

Abstract

Introduction Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks such as quadratus lumborum (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are increasingly used for opioid-sparing analgesia. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic outcome of ultrasound-guided unilateral QLB (lateral approach) and ESPB for use in adult patients undergoing unilateral lower abdominal surgery. Methods In this randomized comparative clinical trial, 48 adult patients scheduled for unilateral lower abdominal surgery were randomized to receive QLB (n = 24) and ESPB (n = 24) following induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours. Results There was no statistical difference for total morphine consumption between the QLB and ESPB groups (5.26 ± 2.17 mg vs. 5.88 ± 2.51 mg; p = 0.376). The median time to first rescue analgesia was greater in the QLB (2 hours [0–18]) vs. the ESPB group (1 hour [0–21]; p = 0.251). Pain scores were not different between groups at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-op (median Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24h: 3 [3–5] QLB, 3 [2–3] ESPB; p = 0.08). There were no differences between groups with respect to hemodynamic parameters, adverse events (nausea and vomiting: 4 in the QLB group, 6 in the ESPB group; p > 0.05) or block performance times (median time: 10min for both). Discussion We consider the clinical role of QLB and ESPB as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in unilateral lower abdominal surgeries. They have a similar safety profile considering the technique and the opioid sparing effects, similar performance characteristics and complication rates, which together suggest both blocks are safe and well-tolerated anesthetic procedures that can be daily practices. Conclusion Both QLB and ESPB provide significant, safe, and comparable postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing unilateral lower abdomen surgery. QLB may provide a slight time benefit to analgesia onset. Trial Registration This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05524038; principal investigator: Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar), registration date: 1/9/ 2022.

The Open Anesthesiology JournalVol. 20(1)
Fayoum University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.