A Reproducible Protocol and Framework for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) Scoring

Estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) scoring in breast cancer is vulnerable to interobserver variability, particularly at diagnostic thresholds. While large language models (LLMs) offer potential as ancillary tools, no standardized deployment framework exists. This is a feasibility and protocol-development study that establishes a reproducible protocol for LLM implementation in pathology labs. Using College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency-testing tissue microarrays, we developed a systematic framework that combines recursive prompt engineering and zero-state reset (ZSR) protocols, requiring fresh chat sessions for each evaluation to prevent conversational bias. Three models were evaluated: Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA), Gemini 3.0 (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA), and Gemma 3.0 12B (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA). The ZSR protocol proved essential, improving accuracy from a 70-80% baseline to ≥95% CAP concordance. Performance varied across models and scoring approaches: Claude achieved the highest concordance (90-98%), followed by Gemini (85-100%) and Gemma (73-93%), demonstrating that systematic prompt refinement, not model capacity, drives diagnostic accuracy. Final concordance exceeded 83% across all models. The locally hosted model approached cloud-level performance within a clinically meaningful range, achieving concordance rates that, while numerically lower, remained within acceptable feasibility thresholds for a protocol development context. We identified systematic error sources, including image artifacts, slide contamination, and compression effects. This protocol provides pathology laboratories with evidence-based guidance for implementing LLM-assisted ER/PR scoring without requiring specialized infrastructure or extensive computational resources. The framework is immediately actionable as a research and quality-assurance tool and provides a reproducible foundation for future clinical validation studies across laboratory settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108708
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reproducible Protocol and Framework for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) Scoring

Alireza Zarineh, Svetoslav Bardarov
Cureus
AI in cancer detection
article

A Reproducible Protocol and Framework for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) Scoring

Alireza Zarineh, Svetoslav Bardarov
article en

Abstract

Estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) scoring in breast cancer is vulnerable to interobserver variability, particularly at diagnostic thresholds. While large language models (LLMs) offer potential as ancillary tools, no standardized deployment framework exists. This is a feasibility and protocol-development study that establishes a reproducible protocol for LLM implementation in pathology labs. Using College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency-testing tissue microarrays, we developed a systematic framework that combines recursive prompt engineering and zero-state reset (ZSR) protocols, requiring fresh chat sessions for each evaluation to prevent conversational bias. Three models were evaluated: Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic, San Francisco, CA, USA), Gemini 3.0 (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA), and Gemma 3.0 12B (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA). The ZSR protocol proved essential, improving accuracy from a 70-80% baseline to ≥95% CAP concordance. Performance varied across models and scoring approaches: Claude achieved the highest concordance (90-98%), followed by Gemini (85-100%) and Gemma (73-93%), demonstrating that systematic prompt refinement, not model capacity, drives diagnostic accuracy. Final concordance exceeded 83% across all models. The locally hosted model approached cloud-level performance within a clinically meaningful range, achieving concordance rates that, while numerically lower, remained within acceptable feasibility thresholds for a protocol development context. We identified systematic error sources, including image artifacts, slide contamination, and compression effects. This protocol provides pathology laboratories with evidence-based guidance for implementing LLM-assisted ER/PR scoring without requiring specialized infrastructure or extensive computational resources. The framework is immediately actionable as a research and quality-assurance tool and provides a reproducible foundation for future clinical validation studies across laboratory settings.

Cureus
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.