Community Perceptions Regarding use of HIV Molecular Epidemiology for Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Findings

Molecular epidemiology (ME) is a field that integrates molecular biology techniques with traditional epidemiological methods to study the distribution, determinants, and dynamics of disease. In the context of HIV, ME involves analysing genetic sequences of the virus to understand patterns of transmission, evolution, and the relationships between social, behavioural, and biological factors that influence transmission. This holds great promise in the global effort to further reduce HIV transmission, although its use raises significant ethical issues. ME is not currently used in Australia's public health response to HIV, although experiences from other countries emphasize the importance of community consultation and support to avoid unintended negative consequences, such as deterring individuals from accessing sexual health services. This article explores the perspectives of twenty-three participants, recruited through HIV/sexual health-related organizations in Victoria, Australia, via nineteen semi-structured interviews and one focus group. Participants included people who regularly test for sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and people diagnosed with HIV and/or syphilis/gonorrhoea. Participants often reported vague or no prior understanding of ME (19/23; 82.6 per cent); however, many of those with vague or no understanding were supportive (16/19; 84.2 per cent). A subset of participants raised concerns, including those related to privacy risks, misuse of data, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. These findings reinforce the need for meaningful community engagement and safeguards for potential ethical use of ME in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10538-0
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community Perceptions Regarding use of HIV Molecular Epidemiology for Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Findings

R. Keane, LA Keogh, J. Hamlet, S.R. Lewin et al.
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Community Perceptions Regarding use of HIV Molecular Epidemiology for Public Health in Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Findings

R. Keane, LA Keogh, J. Hamlet, S.R. Lewin, E. Williams, K. Machoń, A. Cogle, C. M. Haining, J. S. Hocking, D. Chibo, G. Taiaroa, J. E. Brophy, N. Higgins, J. Prestedge, E. J. Wright, D. A. Williamson
article en

Abstract

Molecular epidemiology (ME) is a field that integrates molecular biology techniques with traditional epidemiological methods to study the distribution, determinants, and dynamics of disease. In the context of HIV, ME involves analysing genetic sequences of the virus to understand patterns of transmission, evolution, and the relationships between social, behavioural, and biological factors that influence transmission. This holds great promise in the global effort to further reduce HIV transmission, although its use raises significant ethical issues. ME is not currently used in Australia's public health response to HIV, although experiences from other countries emphasize the importance of community consultation and support to avoid unintended negative consequences, such as deterring individuals from accessing sexual health services. This article explores the perspectives of twenty-three participants, recruited through HIV/sexual health-related organizations in Victoria, Australia, via nineteen semi-structured interviews and one focus group. Participants included people who regularly test for sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and people diagnosed with HIV and/or syphilis/gonorrhoea. Participants often reported vague or no prior understanding of ME (19/23; 82.6 per cent); however, many of those with vague or no understanding were supportive (16/19; 84.2 per cent). A subset of participants raised concerns, including those related to privacy risks, misuse of data, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. These findings reinforce the need for meaningful community engagement and safeguards for potential ethical use of ME in Australia.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Andrews University (US), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), Burnet Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of St Andrews (GB), The Alfred Hospital (AU), National Association of People with HIV Australia (AU), Department of Health and Human Services (AU), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Victoria University (AU)
University of Melbourne, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.