Sonographic Normal Values for Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area

PURPOSE: Neuromuscular ultrasound, including cross-sectional area measurements, adds diagnostic value to the clinical and electrodiagnosis evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Previously published reference values for ulnar nerve size vary widely. Our objective was to establish age-specific reference values for ulnar nerve cross-sectional area at multiple sites in asymptomatic adults for our laboratory. METHODS: Healthy adult subjects without neuromuscular symptoms or disease were recruited from our tertiary referral electromyogram laboratory and staff. Ulnar nerve cross-sectional area measurements were made in short axis at the wrist, forearm, cubital tunnel, retrocondylar groove, 2 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle, and mid-upper arm with the elbow flexed to 90°. Dynamic neuromuscular ultrasound evaluated for subluxation and dislocation at the medial epicondyle. Results were stratified by age group (younger than 40, 40-60, and older than 60 years) with at least 20 subjects per sex per group, as well as by sex, body mass index, and handedness. The upper limit of normal was established as two standard deviations above the mean. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two subjects (ages 18-84, mean 47.7 years) were included. Cross-sectional area significantly increased with age at all sites except the wrist. Cross-sectional area cut-offs at the retrocondylar groove were 10.0, 10.9, and 11.4 mm2, respectively, by age group. Ratios comparing retrocondylar groove and cubital tunnel to arm and forearm were calculated. Thirty-two percent had subluxation or dislocation in at least one limb. CONCLUSIONS: Age-specific cross-sectional area cut-offs and ratios may facilitate a more nuanced interpretation and diagnostic value when used in conjunction with clinical and electrodiagnosis evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0000000000001265
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sonographic Normal Values for Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area

Andrea J. Boon, Marianne T. Luetmer, Ruple S. Laughlin, Eric J. Sorenson et al.
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Sonographic Normal Values for Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area

Andrea J. Boon, Marianne T. Luetmer, Ruple S. Laughlin, Eric J. Sorenson, James B. Meiling
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neuromuscular ultrasound, including cross-sectional area measurements, adds diagnostic value to the clinical and electrodiagnosis evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Previously published reference values for ulnar nerve size vary widely. Our objective was to establish age-specific reference values for ulnar nerve cross-sectional area at multiple sites in asymptomatic adults for our laboratory. METHODS: Healthy adult subjects without neuromuscular symptoms or disease were recruited from our tertiary referral electromyogram laboratory and staff. Ulnar nerve cross-sectional area measurements were made in short axis at the wrist, forearm, cubital tunnel, retrocondylar groove, 2 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle, and mid-upper arm with the elbow flexed to 90°. Dynamic neuromuscular ultrasound evaluated for subluxation and dislocation at the medial epicondyle. Results were stratified by age group (younger than 40, 40-60, and older than 60 years) with at least 20 subjects per sex per group, as well as by sex, body mass index, and handedness. The upper limit of normal was established as two standard deviations above the mean. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two subjects (ages 18-84, mean 47.7 years) were included. Cross-sectional area significantly increased with age at all sites except the wrist. Cross-sectional area cut-offs at the retrocondylar groove were 10.0, 10.9, and 11.4 mm2, respectively, by age group. Ratios comparing retrocondylar groove and cubital tunnel to arm and forearm were calculated. Thirty-two percent had subluxation or dislocation in at least one limb. CONCLUSIONS: Age-specific cross-sectional area cut-offs and ratios may facilitate a more nuanced interpretation and diagnostic value when used in conjunction with clinical and electrodiagnosis evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.