How uncertain can (geometric) measurements be for a conformity and non-conformity assessment?

Abstract The document JCGM 106:2012 outlines two probability-based approaches for evaluate the conformity or non-conformity of a measured value with a specification in Chapters 7 and 8. The ISO 14253-1:2017 is the applicable standard for conformity and non-conformity assessment using a probability-based approach with guard bands for measurement values from geometric measurements. The article presents a possible extension of the ISO 14253-1:2017 to enable the practical application and the use of various distribution functions and the results of a measurement uncertainty determination with Monte Carlo simulation. The article focuses in particular on the questions of which types of distribution functions should be assumed for the measurands depending on the number of measurement points and the value of the measurand, as well as what the effects are for two probability-based approaches from JCGM 106:2012 Chapters 7 and 8 when there is a large measurement uncertainty compared to the tolerance, and what needs to be taken into account. The influence of a measurement uncertainty which is too large in comparison to the tolerance is illustrated in the three relevant cases for both approaches, thus highlighting the need for an appropriately small measurement uncertainty for conformity and non-conformity assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
tm - Technisches Messen
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2026-0007
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How uncertain can (geometric) measurements be for a conformity and non-conformity assessment?

Tino Hausotte, Ulrich Grömme
tm - Technisches Messen
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

How uncertain can (geometric) measurements be for a conformity and non-conformity assessment?

Tino Hausotte, Ulrich Grömme
article en

Abstract

Abstract The document JCGM 106:2012 outlines two probability-based approaches for evaluate the conformity or non-conformity of a measured value with a specification in Chapters 7 and 8. The ISO 14253-1:2017 is the applicable standard for conformity and non-conformity assessment using a probability-based approach with guard bands for measurement values from geometric measurements. The article presents a possible extension of the ISO 14253-1:2017 to enable the practical application and the use of various distribution functions and the results of a measurement uncertainty determination with Monte Carlo simulation. The article focuses in particular on the questions of which types of distribution functions should be assumed for the measurands depending on the number of measurement points and the value of the measurand, as well as what the effects are for two probability-based approaches from JCGM 106:2012 Chapters 7 and 8 when there is a large measurement uncertainty compared to the tolerance, and what needs to be taken into account. The influence of a measurement uncertainty which is too large in comparison to the tolerance is illustrated in the three relevant cases for both approaches, thus highlighting the need for an appropriately small measurement uncertainty for conformity and non-conformity assessment.

tm - Technisches Messen
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), International Council on Mining and Metals (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How uncertain can (geometric) measurements be for a conformity and non-conformity assessment? — Tino Hausotte, Ulrich Grömme · tm - Technisches Messen (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS