Cool and the Gang: Empowering Young Children to Choose Their Own Research Pseudonyms

Whilst anonymisation of participants has long been accepted and expected research practice, this article responds to growing interest in participants making their own choice about the naming practices used. Drawing upon examples from the author’s own doctoral research with children aged 5–6 years, including Cool and friends, this article argues that research participants who are young children should be empowered to select their own pseudonyms and discusses the practicalities of this. The article provides a review of issues around pseudonyms, and other forms of identifiers, and aims to engage researchers from a broad range of fields to encourage discussion and reflection. It concludes with some recommendations that may be particularly useful for undergraduates or others new to, or reconsidering, the use of pseudonyms in their research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261447807
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cool and the Gang: Empowering Young Children to Choose Their Own Research Pseudonyms

Catherine Ann Hughes
Qualitative Inquiry
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Cool and the Gang: Empowering Young Children to Choose Their Own Research Pseudonyms

Catherine Ann Hughes
article en

Abstract

Whilst anonymisation of participants has long been accepted and expected research practice, this article responds to growing interest in participants making their own choice about the naming practices used. Drawing upon examples from the author’s own doctoral research with children aged 5–6 years, including Cool and friends, this article argues that research participants who are young children should be empowered to select their own pseudonyms and discusses the practicalities of this. The article provides a review of issues around pseudonyms, and other forms of identifiers, and aims to engage researchers from a broad range of fields to encourage discussion and reflection. It concludes with some recommendations that may be particularly useful for undergraduates or others new to, or reconsidering, the use of pseudonyms in their research.

Qualitative Inquiry
Genesee Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.