The AI Agent in the Room: Rethinking Consumer Decision‐Making in the Age of Autonomous AI

ABSTRACT The rapid proliferation of AI agents (AIAs) is fundamentally altering how consumers make decisions. Yet marketing scholarship lacks both a shared definition of what constitutes an AIA and a theoretical framework adequate to capture its effects on consumer behavior. This editorial addresses both gaps. We first propose a definition of AIAs organized around three distinguishing features (i.e., autonomy, adaptive learning and memory, and tool‐enabled connectivity) and introduce a typology distinguishing advisory AIAs, which recommend options, from transactional AIAs, which execute decisions on the consumer's behalf. We then present a three‐stage framework of consumer decision‐making with AIAs, comprising consumer prompting, AIA processing, and consumer response, embedded within two dynamic feedback loops: a relational capital loop that shapes trust and delegation across repeated interactions, and an AI learning loop that updates the agent's internal representations over time. Drawing on a systematic mapping of AIA‐focused articles published in leading marketing journals between 2020 and 2026, we show that existing research is heavily concentrated on consumer responses to AI recommendations while largely neglecting prompting behavior, agent cognition, privacy, transparency, and relational dynamics, precisely the domains most distinctive to agentic systems. We argue that the rise of transactional AIAs signals a dual paradigm shift: the consumer is no longer the sole cognitive actor in the purchase process, and preferences may increasingly be co‐constructed through human–agent conversation rather than formed independently. We outline a research agenda to address these gaps and call on scholars in psychology and marketing to develop the theoretical and empirical tools needed to understand decision‐making in the age of AIAs. I am running a few minutes late; my previous meeting is running over.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70165
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The AI Agent in the Room: Rethinking Consumer Decision‐Making in the Age of Autonomous AI

Massimiliano Ostinelli, Anil Bilgihan, Ye Zhang, Melanie Lorenz
Psychology and Marketing
AI in Service Interactions
article

The AI Agent in the Room: Rethinking Consumer Decision‐Making in the Age of Autonomous AI

Massimiliano Ostinelli, Anil Bilgihan, Ye Zhang, Melanie Lorenz
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid proliferation of AI agents (AIAs) is fundamentally altering how consumers make decisions. Yet marketing scholarship lacks both a shared definition of what constitutes an AIA and a theoretical framework adequate to capture its effects on consumer behavior. This editorial addresses both gaps. We first propose a definition of AIAs organized around three distinguishing features (i.e., autonomy, adaptive learning and memory, and tool‐enabled connectivity) and introduce a typology distinguishing advisory AIAs, which recommend options, from transactional AIAs, which execute decisions on the consumer's behalf. We then present a three‐stage framework of consumer decision‐making with AIAs, comprising consumer prompting, AIA processing, and consumer response, embedded within two dynamic feedback loops: a relational capital loop that shapes trust and delegation across repeated interactions, and an AI learning loop that updates the agent's internal representations over time. Drawing on a systematic mapping of AIA‐focused articles published in leading marketing journals between 2020 and 2026, we show that existing research is heavily concentrated on consumer responses to AI recommendations while largely neglecting prompting behavior, agent cognition, privacy, transparency, and relational dynamics, precisely the domains most distinctive to agentic systems. We argue that the rise of transactional AIAs signals a dual paradigm shift: the consumer is no longer the sole cognitive actor in the purchase process, and preferences may increasingly be co‐constructed through human–agent conversation rather than formed independently. We outline a research agenda to address these gaps and call on scholars in psychology and marketing to develop the theoretical and empirical tools needed to understand decision‐making in the age of AIAs. I am running a few minutes late; my previous meeting is running over.

Psychology and Marketing
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.