Integrating In Situ Measurements and Satellite Imagery for Coastal Physical and Biological Analysis in the Cape Fear Coastal Region

Monitoring coastal and estuarine dynamics is crucial for understanding coupled physical, biogeochemical, and human impacts on coastal waters. Motivated by the availability of high spatial resolution ocean color data from the proof-of-concept SeaHawk-HawkEye ocean color CubeSat, this study assesses the capabilities and limitations of satellite remote sensing in capturing shallow water (<10 m) coastal dynamics by integrating in situ measurements with satellite imagery. A Sea Sciences Acrobat collected detailed transects at the mouth of Masonboro Inlet (Wilmington, NC, USA), with “tow-yo” style profiles from the surface to 10 m. It measured conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD), chlorophyll a (Chl a), turbidity, and dissolved oxygen. Satellite data from SeaHawk-HawkEye, Aqua-MODIS, and Sentinel 3A/3B-OLCI provided extensive spatial coverage, revealing surface-level physical/biological interactions, but were only available 48 h after in situ sampling due to cloud cover during field sampling. Tow-yo profiles elucidated a three-dimensional phytoplankton plume, the spatial extent of which we further characterize with satellite imagery, demonstrating the value of integrating in situ and satellite data. A spatial matchup comparison between data from each satellite and the in situ sensor package revealed significant discrepancies across all satellite sensors analyzed, attributed to differences in sensor resolution, atmospheric correction approaches, and proximity to land/benthos. This study emphasizes key challenges with study design and data interpretation in dynamic nearshore environments. In particular, results suggest that meaningful comparisons of satellite vs. in situ observations in such systems require near-synchronous sampling, careful consideration of spatial scale, and improved characterization of optical complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101524
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating In Situ Measurements and Satellite Imagery for Coastal Physical and Biological Analysis in the Cape Fear Coastal Region

Philip J. Bresnahan, Sara Rivero‐Calle, Md Masud‐Ul‐Alam, Mitchell Torkelson et al.
Remote Sensing
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Integrating In Situ Measurements and Satellite Imagery for Coastal Physical and Biological Analysis in the Cape Fear Coastal Region

Philip J. Bresnahan, Sara Rivero‐Calle, Md Masud‐Ul‐Alam, Mitchell Torkelson, David Wells, Robert J. W. Brewin
article en

Abstract

Monitoring coastal and estuarine dynamics is crucial for understanding coupled physical, biogeochemical, and human impacts on coastal waters. Motivated by the availability of high spatial resolution ocean color data from the proof-of-concept SeaHawk-HawkEye ocean color CubeSat, this study assesses the capabilities and limitations of satellite remote sensing in capturing shallow water (<10 m) coastal dynamics by integrating in situ measurements with satellite imagery. A Sea Sciences Acrobat collected detailed transects at the mouth of Masonboro Inlet (Wilmington, NC, USA), with “tow-yo” style profiles from the surface to 10 m. It measured conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD), chlorophyll a (Chl a), turbidity, and dissolved oxygen. Satellite data from SeaHawk-HawkEye, Aqua-MODIS, and Sentinel 3A/3B-OLCI provided extensive spatial coverage, revealing surface-level physical/biological interactions, but were only available 48 h after in situ sampling due to cloud cover during field sampling. Tow-yo profiles elucidated a three-dimensional phytoplankton plume, the spatial extent of which we further characterize with satellite imagery, demonstrating the value of integrating in situ and satellite data. A spatial matchup comparison between data from each satellite and the in situ sensor package revealed significant discrepancies across all satellite sensors analyzed, attributed to differences in sensor resolution, atmospheric correction approaches, and proximity to land/benthos. This study emphasizes key challenges with study design and data interpretation in dynamic nearshore environments. In particular, results suggest that meaningful comparisons of satellite vs. in situ observations in such systems require near-synchronous sampling, careful consideration of spatial scale, and improved characterization of optical complexity.

Remote SensingVol. 18(10)
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Exeter (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, UK Research and Innovation, University of North Carolina Wilmington
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.