Good‐natur'd Dick's Gang Rape: Theorizing Consent and Disability in <i>Fanny Hill</i>

Abstract This article magnifies a fraught episode in John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure (1748) in which a man with cognitive disabilities, Good‐natur'd Dick, is gang raped by two women sex workers. Fanny, the titular woman of pleasure, explicitly identifies the assault as an ‘attack’, and the anecdote reveals the novel's conceptual tensions among consent, gender, and disability. That Fanny's epistle later details Good‐natur'd Dick assaulting Louisa, the second sex worker, in what appears as potentially retributive violence, only further complicates the account in which assailant and survivor become subject positions uneasily exchanged among the three. By re‐reading this tense incident, this article seeks to theorize, through Fanny Hill , the co‐constitutive constructions of consent and disability in the eighteenth century, especially as they inform the new rape studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.70034
Primary Topic
Literature: history, themes, analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good‐natur'd Dick's Gang Rape: Theorizing Consent and Disability in Fanny Hill

Jeremy Chow
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Literature: history, themes, analysis
article

Good‐natur'd Dick's Gang Rape: Theorizing Consent and Disability in Fanny Hill

Jeremy Chow
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article magnifies a fraught episode in John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure (1748) in which a man with cognitive disabilities, Good‐natur'd Dick, is gang raped by two women sex workers. Fanny, the titular woman of pleasure, explicitly identifies the assault as an ‘attack’, and the anecdote reveals the novel's conceptual tensions among consent, gender, and disability. That Fanny's epistle later details Good‐natur'd Dick assaulting Louisa, the second sex worker, in what appears as potentially retributive violence, only further complicates the account in which assailant and survivor become subject positions uneasily exchanged among the three. By re‐reading this tense incident, this article seeks to theorize, through Fanny Hill , the co‐constitutive constructions of consent and disability in the eighteenth century, especially as they inform the new rape studies.

Journal for Eighteenth-Century StudiesVol. 49(2)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Literature: history, themes, analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.