Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Energy Materials: Architectures, Training Strategies, and Applications

ABSTRACT Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) provide a practical route to bridge first‐principles accuracy with the spatiotemporal scales required for modeling complex energy materials. By learning potential‐energy surfaces from density functional theory (DFT) data, MLIPs enable atomistic simulations up to 10 4 –10 6 atoms over nanosecond timescales, thereby extending access to phenomena inaccessible to ab initio molecular dynamics. This review presents a phenomenon‐oriented synthesis of MLIP development, spanning descriptor‐based models, Gaussian process frameworks with uncertainty quantification, equivariant graph neural networks, and foundation models trained on large‐scale datasets. We assess how architectural choices, training strategies (including active learning and multi‐fidelity approaches), and dataset design influence accuracy, transferability, and computational efficiency across representative energy systems. Applications in solid‐state electrolytes, battery electrodes, electrocatalysts, perovskite photovoltaics, and high‐entropy materials are discussed with both performance metrics and methodological rationale. While MLIPs capture qualitative trends and relative property variations, absolute predictions remain sensitive to DFT functional choices, dataset representativeness, and treatment of long‐range interactions. We address a structured validation framework linking model fidelity to experimentally relevant observables and system complexity. Also, we outline emerging directions including generative inverse design, autonomous discovery workflows, and foundation‐model fine‐tuning, highlighting opportunities and limitations for predictive deployment in energy materials research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.71046
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Energy Materials: Architectures, Training Strategies, and Applications

Saeed Pourasad, Kwanghyeon Jo, H Park, Chang Woo Myung et al.
Advanced Energy Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Energy Materials: Architectures, Training Strategies, and Applications

Saeed Pourasad, Kwanghyeon Jo, H Park, Chang Woo Myung, Tan-Lien Pham, Mohammad Zafari, Jinhong Mun, Tae Park, D. ChangMo Yang, Miran Ha, Soohaeng Yoo Willow, Arunkumar Chitteth Rajan, In Kee Park, Gi Beom Sim, Eunjae Jung, Anand Rohit, Won Woong Choi, Geunsik Lee, Bonseung Koo, Kwang S. Kim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) provide a practical route to bridge first‐principles accuracy with the spatiotemporal scales required for modeling complex energy materials. By learning potential‐energy surfaces from density functional theory (DFT) data, MLIPs enable atomistic simulations up to 10 4 –10 6 atoms over nanosecond timescales, thereby extending access to phenomena inaccessible to ab initio molecular dynamics. This review presents a phenomenon‐oriented synthesis of MLIP development, spanning descriptor‐based models, Gaussian process frameworks with uncertainty quantification, equivariant graph neural networks, and foundation models trained on large‐scale datasets. We assess how architectural choices, training strategies (including active learning and multi‐fidelity approaches), and dataset design influence accuracy, transferability, and computational efficiency across representative energy systems. Applications in solid‐state electrolytes, battery electrodes, electrocatalysts, perovskite photovoltaics, and high‐entropy materials are discussed with both performance metrics and methodological rationale. While MLIPs capture qualitative trends and relative property variations, absolute predictions remain sensitive to DFT functional choices, dataset representativeness, and treatment of long‐range interactions. We address a structured validation framework linking model fidelity to experimentally relevant observables and system complexity. Also, we outline emerging directions including generative inverse design, autonomous discovery workflows, and foundation‐model fine‐tuning, highlighting opportunities and limitations for predictive deployment in energy materials research.

Advanced Energy Materials
Institute for Basic Science (KR), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.