Gender Representation in HEED and STEM Occupations: A Longitudinal Analysis of German Language Arts and Mathematics Textbooks (1960–2017)

Abstract Gender stereotypes in educational materials can influence children’s and adolescents’ career aspirations, contributing to persistent occupational gender segregation. However, large-scale, longitudinal studies examining gender representation in stereotypical occupational domains in textbooks across different school subjects remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the gender representation in two key occupational domains: science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and health care, early education, and domestic work (HEED) across 820 German language arts and mathematics textbooks from 1960 to 2017. Using a binomial generalized linear mixed model with a discontinuity design we tested how representation was related to time, the 1986 governmental resolution on gender equity, subject area, and occupational domain. Results revealed substantially lower female representation in STEM than HEED occupations throughout the study period. Female STEM representation increased from 0.0% to 9.1%, while HEED representation increased from 12.2% to 23.1%. The 1986 resolution had divergent effects across subjects: female representation increased in German language arts textbooks but decreased in mathematics textbooks. A significant three-way interaction revealed that temporal changes in female representation relate to both subject area and occupational domain. In German language arts textbooks, female representation increased in both HEED and STEM domains, while in mathematics textbooks, female HEED representation increased (from 7.4% to 20.5%), but female STEM representation remained stable (from 1.4% to 1.0%). After 1986, the odds of a STEM occupation mention being female were almost six times higher in German language arts than in mathematics textbooks. These findings demonstrate that progress toward gender-equitable representation is context-dependent, with mathematics textbooks perpetuating stronger occupational stereotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex Roles
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-026-01649-y
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Representation in HEED and STEM Occupations: A Longitudinal Analysis of German Language Arts and Mathematics Textbooks (1960–2017)

Diana Wengler, Michael Heilemann, Heidrun Stoeger, Bernhard Fruehwirth
Sex Roles
Gender Studies in Language
article

Gender Representation in HEED and STEM Occupations: A Longitudinal Analysis of German Language Arts and Mathematics Textbooks (1960–2017)

Diana Wengler, Michael Heilemann, Heidrun Stoeger, Bernhard Fruehwirth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Gender stereotypes in educational materials can influence children’s and adolescents’ career aspirations, contributing to persistent occupational gender segregation. However, large-scale, longitudinal studies examining gender representation in stereotypical occupational domains in textbooks across different school subjects remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the gender representation in two key occupational domains: science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and health care, early education, and domestic work (HEED) across 820 German language arts and mathematics textbooks from 1960 to 2017. Using a binomial generalized linear mixed model with a discontinuity design we tested how representation was related to time, the 1986 governmental resolution on gender equity, subject area, and occupational domain. Results revealed substantially lower female representation in STEM than HEED occupations throughout the study period. Female STEM representation increased from 0.0% to 9.1%, while HEED representation increased from 12.2% to 23.1%. The 1986 resolution had divergent effects across subjects: female representation increased in German language arts textbooks but decreased in mathematics textbooks. A significant three-way interaction revealed that temporal changes in female representation relate to both subject area and occupational domain. In German language arts textbooks, female representation increased in both HEED and STEM domains, while in mathematics textbooks, female HEED representation increased (from 7.4% to 20.5%), but female STEM representation remained stable (from 1.4% to 1.0%). After 1986, the odds of a STEM occupation mention being female were almost six times higher in German language arts than in mathematics textbooks. These findings demonstrate that progress toward gender-equitable representation is context-dependent, with mathematics textbooks perpetuating stronger occupational stereotypes.

Sex RolesVol. 92(3)
University of Regensburg (DE)
Universität Regensburg
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.