Critical evaluation of drug response prediction models with DrEval

Large-scale drug sensitivity screens have enabled training drug response prediction models based on cancer cell line omics profiles to advance personalized medicine. While model performances reported in the literature appear promising, successful translation to the clinic remains limited. In this work, we discuss key obstacles that lead to overly optimistic performance estimates of state-of-the-art models, making it challenging to track progress in the field. To address them, we present DrEval, a pipeline for unbiased, biologically meaningful evaluation of cancer drug response models. DrEval is designed as a living open-source benchmark that integrates baseline and literature models with standardized hyperparameter tuning, statistically rigorous evaluation, cross-study benchmarks, and supports ablation studies and publication-ready visualizations. Using DrEval, we show that deep learning models barely outperform a naive model that predicts only the mean drug and cell line effects, while no complex model outperforms properly tuned tree-based ensemble baselines in relevant settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72903-w
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical evaluation of drug response prediction models with DrEval

Judith Bernett, Mario Picciani, Pascal Iversen, Katharina Baum et al.
Nature Communications
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Critical evaluation of drug response prediction models with DrEval

Judith Bernett, Mario Picciani, Pascal Iversen, Katharina Baum, Markus List, Mathias Wilhelm
article en

Abstract

Large-scale drug sensitivity screens have enabled training drug response prediction models based on cancer cell line omics profiles to advance personalized medicine. While model performances reported in the literature appear promising, successful translation to the clinic remains limited. In this work, we discuss key obstacles that lead to overly optimistic performance estimates of state-of-the-art models, making it challenging to track progress in the field. To address them, we present DrEval, a pipeline for unbiased, biologically meaningful evaluation of cancer drug response models. DrEval is designed as a living open-source benchmark that integrates baseline and literature models with standardized hyperparameter tuning, statistically rigorous evaluation, cross-study benchmarks, and supports ablation studies and publication-ready visualizations. Using DrEval, we show that deep learning models barely outperform a naive model that predicts only the mean drug and cell line effects, while no complex model outperforms properly tuned tree-based ensemble baselines in relevant settings.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich (DE), Isotopen Technologien München (Germany) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.