From the what to the how: why the stewardship of ethics implementation in AI healthcare matters

Abstract The release of Generative AI and its availability to the general population was a game changer. Making Generative AI accessible to members of the public opened up knowledge that was previously guarded by experts. As a result, Generative AI is changing the relationship between AI, patient and clinicians. Ethics guidelines issued by governments lay out what should be considered when implementing AI-enabled healthcare. However, how these guidelines are implemented matters. This perspective reflects on the complexity of the task, and how to go about it. Systems Thinking is a well-suited discipline to the task of implementing AI-enabled healthcare and involves participatory processes. However, given the financial and epistemic power imbalance between the AI technology owners and its users, there is a need for strong stewardship of the process. First Nations of Australia cultural processes offer possible guidance about how to enact this stewardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01155-7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the what to the how: why the stewardship of ethics implementation in AI healthcare matters

Magali Goirand, Robyn Clay‐Williams, Elizabeth Austin
AI and Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

From the what to the how: why the stewardship of ethics implementation in AI healthcare matters

Magali Goirand, Robyn Clay‐Williams, Elizabeth Austin
article en

Abstract

Abstract The release of Generative AI and its availability to the general population was a game changer. Making Generative AI accessible to members of the public opened up knowledge that was previously guarded by experts. As a result, Generative AI is changing the relationship between AI, patient and clinicians. Ethics guidelines issued by governments lay out what should be considered when implementing AI-enabled healthcare. However, how these guidelines are implemented matters. This perspective reflects on the complexity of the task, and how to go about it. Systems Thinking is a well-suited discipline to the task of implementing AI-enabled healthcare and involves participatory processes. However, given the financial and epistemic power imbalance between the AI technology owners and its users, there is a need for strong stewardship of the process. First Nations of Australia cultural processes offer possible guidance about how to enact this stewardship.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(3)
Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From the what to the how: why the stewardship of ethics implementation in AI healthcare matters — Magali Goirand, Robyn Clay‐Williams, et al. · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS