Reallocation Effects of Internalizing Externalities: Evidence From China's Straw Burning Ban

ABSTRACT This paper examines the reallocation effects of a typical environmental policy aiming to internalize externalities: the straw burning ban across China. The ban prohibited the traditional farming practice of burning straw while compelling the labour‐intensive practice of straw utilization. We show that the legislation banning straw burning led to an increase in local land renting activities. Our results indicate that implementation of the ban resulted in a within‐village land redistribution, encouraging the exit of less‐productive farmers while promoting land expansion by more‐productive farmers. Consequently, village‐level aggregate agricultural output and productivity increased by 5% and 3%, respectively. A complementary policy instrument to the command‐and‐control ban—establishing biomass power plants to incentivize farmers to collect crop residues—led to a greater land redistribution in villages with a nearby biomass power plant after the ban is imposed, relative to before.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70052
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reallocation Effects of Internalizing Externalities: Evidence From China's Straw Burning Ban

Wenyuan Hua
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Reallocation Effects of Internalizing Externalities: Evidence From China's Straw Burning Ban

Wenyuan Hua
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the reallocation effects of a typical environmental policy aiming to internalize externalities: the straw burning ban across China. The ban prohibited the traditional farming practice of burning straw while compelling the labour‐intensive practice of straw utilization. We show that the legislation banning straw burning led to an increase in local land renting activities. Our results indicate that implementation of the ban resulted in a within‐village land redistribution, encouraging the exit of less‐productive farmers while promoting land expansion by more‐productive farmers. Consequently, village‐level aggregate agricultural output and productivity increased by 5% and 3%, respectively. A complementary policy instrument to the command‐and‐control ban—establishing biomass power plants to incentivize farmers to collect crop residues—led to a greater land redistribution in villages with a nearby biomass power plant after the ban is imposed, relative to before.

Journal of Agricultural Economics
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.