Effectiveness and safety of implantable vagus nerve stimulation in people with primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures

OBJECTIVE: Most therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) focus on focal-onset seizures, the most common seizure types. Studying primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) is more challenging due to diagnostic and recruitment difficulties. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is globally established in DRE with focal-onset seizures, approved indications vary by region. This study assesses the safety and effectiveness of VNS therapy in individuals with drug-resistant PGTCS. METHODS: Data from five studies were included in the analysis. The PGTCS group included 170 participants with reported PGTCS who received VNS therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Outcomes included observed and Bayesian-estimated PGTCS responder rates (≥50% seizure reduction) and seizure frequency changes. Observed rates were determined from clinical studies, while Bayesian responder rates were estimated using a hierarchical model. RESULTS: The Bayesian hierarchical model estimated the 24-month PGTCS responder rate for patients in CORE-VNS to be 65.2% (95% credible interval: 55.1%-75.1%). The Bayesian estimate at 24 months for responder rates across all studies was 65.5%. Most responders (91.7%) maintained their response from 6 and 12 months to 24 months. Median seizure frequency decreased by 71.4% for PGTCS and 62.5% for all seizures at 24 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low and consistent with those seen in people with focal-onset seizures treated with VNS therapy. No new safety concerns were identified, including no increased risk of Status Epilepticus (SE) or death. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support VNS therapy as a safe and effective treatment for reducing PGTCS in participants with DRE. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) carry higher risks of complications and death than focal-onset seizures. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS therapy) is approved for drug-resistant PGTCS outside the USA. Data from five LivaNova-sponsored clinical studies show that VNS therapy is safe and effective in adults and children. Among 170 participants, about 66% had a ≥50% reduction in PGTCS at 24 months, and 92% of early responders maintained improvement. Among 149 participants, median PGTCS frequency fell by 71%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were low, with no new safety concerns identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia Open
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70281
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and safety of implantable vagus nerve stimulation in people with primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures

Justine Curley, Gaia Giannicola, Kathryn Nichol, Maxine Dibué et al.
Epilepsia Open
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

Effectiveness and safety of implantable vagus nerve stimulation in people with primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures

Justine Curley, Gaia Giannicola, Kathryn Nichol, Maxine Dibué, Charles Gordon, Katherine Eggleston, Ryan Verner
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most therapies for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) focus on focal-onset seizures, the most common seizure types. Studying primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) is more challenging due to diagnostic and recruitment difficulties. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is globally established in DRE with focal-onset seizures, approved indications vary by region. This study assesses the safety and effectiveness of VNS therapy in individuals with drug-resistant PGTCS. METHODS: Data from five studies were included in the analysis. The PGTCS group included 170 participants with reported PGTCS who received VNS therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Outcomes included observed and Bayesian-estimated PGTCS responder rates (≥50% seizure reduction) and seizure frequency changes. Observed rates were determined from clinical studies, while Bayesian responder rates were estimated using a hierarchical model. RESULTS: The Bayesian hierarchical model estimated the 24-month PGTCS responder rate for patients in CORE-VNS to be 65.2% (95% credible interval: 55.1%-75.1%). The Bayesian estimate at 24 months for responder rates across all studies was 65.5%. Most responders (91.7%) maintained their response from 6 and 12 months to 24 months. Median seizure frequency decreased by 71.4% for PGTCS and 62.5% for all seizures at 24 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low and consistent with those seen in people with focal-onset seizures treated with VNS therapy. No new safety concerns were identified, including no increased risk of Status Epilepticus (SE) or death. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support VNS therapy as a safe and effective treatment for reducing PGTCS in participants with DRE. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) carry higher risks of complications and death than focal-onset seizures. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS therapy) is approved for drug-resistant PGTCS outside the USA. Data from five LivaNova-sponsored clinical studies show that VNS therapy is safe and effective in adults and children. Among 170 participants, about 66% had a ≥50% reduction in PGTCS at 24 months, and 92% of early responders maintained improvement. Among 149 participants, median PGTCS frequency fell by 71%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were low, with no new safety concerns identified.

Epilepsia Open
LivaNova (United Kingdom) (GB), Neurocrine Biosciences (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.