The F‐words for childhood development in community‐based physical activity programmes for children with physical disabilities: A scoping review

AIM: To identify intervention ingredients used to address the F-words for childhood development in community-based physical activity programmes for children with physical disabilities, the programme outcomes, and the strength of available evidence. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Electronic database and hand searches of international literature identified studies that evaluated community-based physical activity programmes for children with a physical disability with impaired gross motor skills (e.g. sitting, walking) ranging from mild limitations in speed, balance, and coordination to severe impairment requiring the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Intervention ingredients were mapped to the six F-words: functioning, fitness, friends, family, fun, and future. Primary study outcomes were tallied and themed. Evidence strength was assessed using the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four primary research articles were included. Most studies addressed the concept of functioning, fitness, fun, and friends, and few studies addressed family and future. Thirty common intervention ingredients were identified to deliver the F-words. Eight key outcome areas were identified. Most studies were level IV evidence and possessed a serious level of bias. INTERPRETATION: Despite identifying numerous intervention ingredients mapped to the F-words, the overall evidence base remains weak. Strengthening the quality and scope of research is essential to ensure the F-words framework is applied inclusively for physical activities across diverse populations of children with physical disabilities in community contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70306
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The F‐words for childhood development in community‐based physical activity programmes for children with physical disabilities: A scoping review

Belinda Munroe, Sarah Ashcroft, Sarah Reedman, Suzanne Lock et al.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

The F‐words for childhood development in community‐based physical activity programmes for children with physical disabilities: A scoping review

Belinda Munroe, Sarah Ashcroft, Sarah Reedman, Suzanne Lock, Kylie Turner, Belinda Arnold
article en

Abstract

AIM: To identify intervention ingredients used to address the F-words for childhood development in community-based physical activity programmes for children with physical disabilities, the programme outcomes, and the strength of available evidence. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Electronic database and hand searches of international literature identified studies that evaluated community-based physical activity programmes for children with a physical disability with impaired gross motor skills (e.g. sitting, walking) ranging from mild limitations in speed, balance, and coordination to severe impairment requiring the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Intervention ingredients were mapped to the six F-words: functioning, fitness, friends, family, fun, and future. Primary study outcomes were tallied and themed. Evidence strength was assessed using the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four primary research articles were included. Most studies addressed the concept of functioning, fitness, fun, and friends, and few studies addressed family and future. Thirty common intervention ingredients were identified to deliver the F-words. Eight key outcome areas were identified. Most studies were level IV evidence and possessed a serious level of bias. INTERPRETATION: Despite identifying numerous intervention ingredients mapped to the F-words, the overall evidence base remains weak. Strengthening the quality and scope of research is essential to ensure the F-words framework is applied inclusively for physical activities across diverse populations of children with physical disabilities in community contexts.

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
University of Wollongong (AU), Cerebral Palsy Alliance (AU), Wollongong Hospital (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.