Vietnamese Career-Trajectory Case Taxonomy: A Six-Type Synthesis with Field-by-Field Application across Major Undergraduate Degrees for Layer-I Series

This paper produces a six-trajectory case taxonomy for Vietnamese post-undergraduate-degree career patterns and applies it field-by-field across the nine major Vietnamese degree clusters. The taxonomy synthesises international careerresearch literature — Savickas career-construction theory, Hall protean-career, Arthur-Rousseau boundaryless-career, BriscoeHall-DeMuth protean-boundaryless two-by-two, Sullivan-Baruch advances-in-careers review, Rodrigues-Guest career-patterns, Lent-Brown-Hackett social-cognitive career theory, Holland vocational fit, plus the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook and Cedefop European Skills Forecast as international comparators — with the Vietnamese labour-market evidence base assembled in I3.2 (GSO LFS, MOLISA, VietnamWorks, JobStreet, TopCV, Anphabe, TopDev, ILO Vietnam, World Bank, ADB) plus sectorspecific Vietnamese sources covering medical-resident, publicteaching, and legal-profession pathways. Six trajectory types are specified: T1 linear-ladder, T2 lateral-hop, T3 founder-andfreelance, T4 field-exit, T5 specialist-depth, T6 internationalpivot. Each is given a structural-driver definition, characteristic 5- / 10- / 15-year endpoints, common exit routes, and an illustrative profile. The taxonomy is then applied field-byfield across CNTT and information technology, economics and finance, engineering, medicine and pharmacy, education and teacher training, foreign-language studies, law, basic sciences, and arts. The substantive contribution is the field × trajectory × endpoint matrix, which names the dominant trajectory types per field, characteristic 5- / 10- / 15-year endpoints in role-andsalary-band terms, common pivots, and work-life patterns. The matrix is calibrated to displace the dominant single-trajectory romanticisations of Vietnamese popular career-guidance content. It feeds into the I3.1 major-decision framework at Step 4 (labourmarket reality check, surfacing endpoint-distribution rather than starting-wage point estimates) and Step 5 (exploration heuristics, distinguishing reversible-choice fields from specialist-credentiallocked fields), and into I4.x skill-investment by identifying which skills compound under each trajectory type and which compress under the AI-disruption overlay from I4.3. Per program scope, no cohort empirics; literature and secondary-source synthesis only. VN salary-trajectory data are partial and gaps are documented; no specific salary predictions are issued, only documented-range bands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20131639
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Vietnamese Career-Trajectory Case Taxonomy: A Six-Type Synthesis with Field-by-Field Application across Major Undergraduate Degrees for Layer-I Series

That Le
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Higher Education and Employability
preprint

Vietnamese Career-Trajectory Case Taxonomy: A Six-Type Synthesis with Field-by-Field Application across Major Undergraduate Degrees for Layer-I Series

That Le
preprint en

Abstract

This paper produces a six-trajectory case taxonomy for Vietnamese post-undergraduate-degree career patterns and applies it field-by-field across the nine major Vietnamese degree clusters. The taxonomy synthesises international careerresearch literature — Savickas career-construction theory, Hall protean-career, Arthur-Rousseau boundaryless-career, BriscoeHall-DeMuth protean-boundaryless two-by-two, Sullivan-Baruch advances-in-careers review, Rodrigues-Guest career-patterns, Lent-Brown-Hackett social-cognitive career theory, Holland vocational fit, plus the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook and Cedefop European Skills Forecast as international comparators — with the Vietnamese labour-market evidence base assembled in I3.2 (GSO LFS, MOLISA, VietnamWorks, JobStreet, TopCV, Anphabe, TopDev, ILO Vietnam, World Bank, ADB) plus sectorspecific Vietnamese sources covering medical-resident, publicteaching, and legal-profession pathways. Six trajectory types are specified: T1 linear-ladder, T2 lateral-hop, T3 founder-andfreelance, T4 field-exit, T5 specialist-depth, T6 internationalpivot. Each is given a structural-driver definition, characteristic 5- / 10- / 15-year endpoints, common exit routes, and an illustrative profile. The taxonomy is then applied field-byfield across CNTT and information technology, economics and finance, engineering, medicine and pharmacy, education and teacher training, foreign-language studies, law, basic sciences, and arts. The substantive contribution is the field × trajectory × endpoint matrix, which names the dominant trajectory types per field, characteristic 5- / 10- / 15-year endpoints in role-andsalary-band terms, common pivots, and work-life patterns. The matrix is calibrated to displace the dominant single-trajectory romanticisations of Vietnamese popular career-guidance content. It feeds into the I3.1 major-decision framework at Step 4 (labourmarket reality check, surfacing endpoint-distribution rather than starting-wage point estimates) and Step 5 (exploration heuristics, distinguishing reversible-choice fields from specialist-credentiallocked fields), and into I4.x skill-investment by identifying which skills compound under each trajectory type and which compress under the AI-disruption overlay from I4.3. Per program scope, no cohort empirics; literature and secondary-source synthesis only. VN salary-trajectory data are partial and gaps are documented; no specific salary predictions are issued, only documented-range bands.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
ElSohly Laboratories (United States) (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.