Treatment Outcomes of Total Versus Superficial Parotidectomy With Postoperative Radiotherapy for High‐Grade Parotid Carcinoma Confined to the Superficial Lobe: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Analysis

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical management of high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe remains controversial, with limited evidence comparing total and superficial parotidectomy in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes and complications between total parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (TP + PORT) and superficial parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (SP + PORT). STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients (> 18 years) with high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe treated between 2011 and 2023 were identified at tertiary centres. Exclusion criteria included preoperative facial nerve palsy, metastatic disease to the parotid gland, prior head and neck radiotherapy, receipt of concurrent chemoradiation and follow-up < 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included (TP + PORT, n = 63; SP + PORT, n = 45) with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for older age and a higher proportion of Milan category VI cytology in the TP + PORT group (p < 0.05). Local, regional and distant recurrence rates and mortality did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.55, 0.26, 1.00 and 0.36, respectively). All local recurrences occurred within 24 months (mean: 7.2 months). Age and positive resection margins were independent predictors of mortality (p < 0.01). Five-year overall survival was 73.0% in the TP + PORT group and 81.5% in the SP + PORT group. IPTW-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in recurrence or mortality between groups (hazard ratio for mortality, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.32-1.90; p = 0.59). Permanent facial nerve palsy was significantly more common after TP + PORT (14.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), while other complications were similar. CONCLUSION: Superficial parotidectomy with adequate margins followed by PORT achieves comparable oncologic outcomes with significantly fewer complications and may be preferred for high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d (JBI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Otolaryngology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.70115
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Outcomes of Total Versus Superficial Parotidectomy With Postoperative Radiotherapy for High‐Grade Parotid Carcinoma Confined to the Superficial Lobe: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Analysis

Tapanut Ariyanon, Wisarut Samuckkeethum, Narin Ratanaprasert, Stephen John Kerr et al.
Clinical Otolaryngology
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Treatment Outcomes of Total Versus Superficial Parotidectomy With Postoperative Radiotherapy for High‐Grade Parotid Carcinoma Confined to the Superficial Lobe: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Analysis

Tapanut Ariyanon, Wisarut Samuckkeethum, Narin Ratanaprasert, Stephen John Kerr, Pasawat Supanimitjaroenporn, Jakkree Naruekon, Yosita Muenkaew, Wirut Iamsahakiat, Thanapat Supakmontri, Kornkiat Snidvongs
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical management of high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe remains controversial, with limited evidence comparing total and superficial parotidectomy in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes and complications between total parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (TP + PORT) and superficial parotidectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (SP + PORT). STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients (> 18 years) with high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe treated between 2011 and 2023 were identified at tertiary centres. Exclusion criteria included preoperative facial nerve palsy, metastatic disease to the parotid gland, prior head and neck radiotherapy, receipt of concurrent chemoradiation and follow-up < 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included (TP + PORT, n = 63; SP + PORT, n = 45) with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for older age and a higher proportion of Milan category VI cytology in the TP + PORT group (p < 0.05). Local, regional and distant recurrence rates and mortality did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.55, 0.26, 1.00 and 0.36, respectively). All local recurrences occurred within 24 months (mean: 7.2 months). Age and positive resection margins were independent predictors of mortality (p < 0.01). Five-year overall survival was 73.0% in the TP + PORT group and 81.5% in the SP + PORT group. IPTW-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in recurrence or mortality between groups (hazard ratio for mortality, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.32-1.90; p = 0.59). Permanent facial nerve palsy was significantly more common after TP + PORT (14.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), while other complications were similar. CONCLUSION: Superficial parotidectomy with adequate margins followed by PORT achieves comparable oncologic outcomes with significantly fewer complications and may be preferred for high-grade parotid carcinoma confined to the superficial lobe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2d (JBI).

Clinical Otolaryngology
Prince of Songkla University (TH), Siriraj Hospital (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Khon Kaen University (TH), Mahidol University (TH), Thammasat University Hospital (TH), National Cancer Institute of Thailand (TH), HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration (TH), New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry (AU), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.