Teacher leaders and policy making: Examining access, influence, and boundaries

Teacher leadership is framed as participatory governance, yet teacher leaders (TLs) may remain implementers rather than authorized co-deciders. This qualitative study examines TLs’ participation in school-level policy making through three governance dimensions: access, influence, and boundary crossing. Findings from semi-structured interviews with 20 classroom TLs suggest that access is managed through selective invitation, service-based entry, and informal corridor decision circuits, shaping where TLs can exert influence. Consequently, influence concentrates in low-stakes pedagogical domains and is often diluted or reversed during formal approval as issues become more sensitive and consequential. Under such conditions, boundary regulation tightens, producing performative participation and self-silencing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management in Education
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206261451152
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teacher leaders and policy making: Examining access, influence, and boundaries

Asmaa Al-Fadala, Norma Ghamrawi
Management in Education
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Teacher leaders and policy making: Examining access, influence, and boundaries

Asmaa Al-Fadala, Norma Ghamrawi
article en

Abstract

Teacher leadership is framed as participatory governance, yet teacher leaders (TLs) may remain implementers rather than authorized co-deciders. This qualitative study examines TLs’ participation in school-level policy making through three governance dimensions: access, influence, and boundary crossing. Findings from semi-structured interviews with 20 classroom TLs suggest that access is managed through selective invitation, service-based entry, and informal corridor decision circuits, shaping where TLs can exert influence. Consequently, influence concentrates in low-stakes pedagogical domains and is often diluted or reversed during formal approval as issues become more sensitive and consequential. Under such conditions, boundary regulation tightens, producing performative participation and self-silencing.

Management in Education
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.